| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2021 SLG 2399 2021 SLD 2399 2021 CLC 1880 |
Islamabad High Court
Civil Revision No.260 of 2014, decided on 16th April, 2021,Date of hearing: 4th March, 2021.
BABAR SATTAR, JUSTICE
Attique ur Rehman Kiani and Imran Haider for Petitioners.Tahir Afzal Abbasi and Shahzad Kiyani for
Respondents.
Civil Revision No.260 of 2014, decided on 16th April, 2021,Date of hearing: 4th March, 2021.
BABAR SATTAR, JUSTICE
Attique ur Rehman Kiani and Imran Haider for Petitioners.Tahir Afzal Abbasi and Shahzad Kiyani for
Respondents.
KHALID IQBAL AND OTHERSVSSHAHID IQBAL AND OTHErs
Law: Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)
Section: 55,56,92,119
Law: Limitation Act, 1908
Section: 3
Law: General Clauses Act, 1897
Section: 24A
(a) Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)--- ----Arts. 55, 56, 92, 119---Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S. 3---Suit for inheritance---Relevancy of of other courts/Plaintiffs challenged two mutations of year 1908 to be consequence of fraud committed by the processor-in-interest of the petitioners/defendants against the predecessor-in-interest of the respondents---Trial Court dismissed the suit---Appellate Court allowed appeal---Validity---Held, that no reasons had been recorded by the appellate court to explain as to why entries in the record made back in 1904-05 were to be altered---Trial Court seemed to have been swayed by order of other Court for alteration of entries in mutation record of another village also sanctioned in 1908 involving the predecessors-in-interest of the same parties---To conflict with revenue record would bear the onus to rebut the presumption of correctness attached thereto through convincing evidence---Standard of proof required to establish fraud would not become less stringent merely because the alleged fraud transpired a long time back and onus could not be discharged due to non-availability of evidence and efflux of time---No evidence existed to uphold the declaration of rights---Revision petition was allowed and suit was declared as time-barred. Nawab Khan v. Said Karim Khan 1997 SMCR 1840 ref. (b) Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)--- ----Arts. 55 56---Judgment/findings of another Court---Relevancy---Trial court could not use the /findings of another court that did not fall within the scope of S.55 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984 as a substitute for its own findings of fact backed by the evidence adduced before it---Court acting under the influence of a rendered by another court in relation to a claim of the respondents property in another village was a breach of S.56 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984. Mistri Muhammad Din v. Rawalpindi Improvement Trust, Rawalpindi 1976 SCMR 283 and Muhammad Sohail v. Government of N.W.F.-P. 1996 SCMR 218 rel. (c) Limitation Act (IX of 1908)--- ----S.3---Suit for inheritance---Fraud, allegation of---Limitation period---Applicability---No principle of general application was laid out in the jurisprudence pursuant to which…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492