| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2021 SLG 1063 2021 SLD 1063 2021 PLC 420 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 4862 of 2018, heard on 19th August, 2020, Date of hearing: 19th August, 2020. (Against the judgment Dated 23.11.2018 of the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad passed in Appeal No. 508(P)CS/2013).
IJAZ UL AHSAN, JUSTICE, QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, JUSTICE GULZAR AHMED, CHIEF JUSTICE
Aftab Alam Yasir, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Nasir Mehmood, Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondents Nos.1 and 2.
Civil Petition No. 4862 of 2018, heard on 19th August, 2020, Date of hearing: 19th August, 2020. (Against the judgment Dated 23.11.2018 of the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad passed in Appeal No. 508(P)CS/2013).
IJAZ UL AHSAN, JUSTICE, QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, JUSTICE GULZAR AHMED, CHIEF JUSTICE
Aftab Alam Yasir, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Nasir Mehmood, Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondents Nos.1 and 2.
AJMIR SHAH, EX-SEPOY
VS
THE INSPECTOR-GENERAL, FRONTIER CORPS KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA AND ANOTHER
Law: Frontier Corps Ordinance, 1959
Section: 10
(a) Frontier Corps Rules, 1961--- ----R. 14---Frontier Corps Ordinance (XXVI of 1959), S.10---Sepoy in Frontier Corps---Appeal against dismissal from service---Time barred appeal---Reading of R. 14 of the Frontier Corps Rules, 1961 and S. 10 of the Frontier Corps Ordinance, 1959, made it clear that petitioner-Sepoy was entitled to file departmental appeal against the order imposing upon him penalty of dismissal from service and such departmental appeal had to be filed by the petitioner within one month from the date on which he was informed of the order appealed against---Admittedly the petitioner filed the departmental appeal against the order of dismissal dated 23-10-2008 on 28-03-2013, i.e. after more than 4 years and 5 months---In terms of R. 14 of the Frontier Corps Rules, 1961 the petitioner was required to apply to the authority against whose order he wished to file an appeal for extension of time citing unavoidable causes of delay and only after the authority had so certified, the delay in filing of the departmental appeal could be condoned---However the record showed that the petitioner had not applied to the authority seeking extension of time for filing of a departmental appeal--- Furthermore the principle of implied extension could not be pressed in the present case, for that, in terms of the R. 14 the appellate authority was not vested with the power of granting extension in filing of a departmental appeal---Service Tribunal had rightly found the service appeal of the petitioner to be time barred---Petition for leave to appeal was dismissed and leave was refused. Usman Ali Chhachhar v. Moula Bukhsh Chhachhar 2019 SCMR 2043) = 2020 PLC (C.S.) 34 distinguished. (b) Frontier Corps Rules, 1961--- ----R. 14---Frontier Corps Ordinance (XXVI of 1959). S. 10---Sepoy in Frontier Corps---Appeal against dismissal from service---Time barred appeal---Departmental appeal against dismissal order had to be filed by the petitioner-Sepoy within one month from the date on which he was informed of the order appealed against, however he filed the same after more than 4 years and 5 months---Plea of petitioner that he did not file the departmental appeal within time, forβ¦
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492