| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2022 SLG 754 2022 SLD 754 2022 PTD 732 2022 PTCL 805 (2024) 129 TAX 687 |
Sindh High Court
C.P. No. D-5674 of 2020, decided on 2nd September, 2021, Date of hearing: 2nd September, 2021.
MUHAMMAD SHAFT SIDDIQUI, JUSTICE, AGHA FAISAL, JUSTICE
Sardar Muhammad Ishaque for Petitioner. Kafeel Ahmed Abbasi, DAG along with Hussain Vohra, Asstt. Attorney General for
Respondent No.1. Mohabbat Hussain Awan along with Mohib Khan, Assistant Collector, MCC Port Qasim for
Respondents Nos.2 to 4.
C.P. No. D-5674 of 2020, decided on 2nd September, 2021, Date of hearing: 2nd September, 2021.
MUHAMMAD SHAFT SIDDIQUI, JUSTICE, AGHA FAISAL, JUSTICE
Sardar Muhammad Ishaque for Petitioner. Kafeel Ahmed Abbasi, DAG along with Hussain Vohra, Asstt. Attorney General for
Respondent No.1. Mohabbat Hussain Awan along with Mohib Khan, Assistant Collector, MCC Port Qasim for
Respondents Nos.2 to 4.
MESSRS SPECTRUM ENTERPRISES THROUGH ATTORNEY
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD AND 3 OTHERS
Law: Customs Act, 1969
Section: 79(1),81,81(1),81(2),81(4)
(a) Customs Act (IV of 1969)---S.81 Provisional determination of liability Delay in making final determination Effect Petitioner imported two consignments and filed goods declaration ---- Declaration was objected by the department and consequently under S. 81 of Customs Act, 1969, the goods were provisionally released after securing the differential amount of duties and taxes Petitioner, after lapse of more than a year, filed constitutional petition for release of the security as the department had failed to make final determination within the time prescribed under subsection (2) of S.81 of Customs Act, 1969 Release was objected on the grounds that the subsection (4) of S.81 of Customs Act, 1969 provided that if final determination was not completed within the period prescribed under subsection (2) of S.81 then the provisional determination would be deemed to be final determination and that the explanation to the subsection (4) of S.81 Customs Act, 1969 had defined the provisional assessment as the amount of duties and taxes paid or secured by Bank Guarantee or pay orders Validity Word provisional assessment was neither used in subsection (1) of S.81 nor in subsection (2) of S.81 Customs Act, 1969 Subsection (1) of S.81 had secured differential amount on provisional determination and provisional assessment If the interpretation of department was accepted then Customs would never bother to determine it finally and would enjoy benefit of not doing anything after provisional release To claim the amount which was secured from the importer as differential amount, the final determination was inevitable Since final determination was neither made within the prescribed time nor within any extended period of time, therefore, the High Court allowed the petition to the extent that the amount of security would be released. 2011 PTD 235 ref. (b) Customs Act (IV of 1969) ---- S.81 Provisional determination of liability Scope Spirit of S.81 Customs Act, 1969 provides that when it is not possible for the officer of the Customs to reach to the correctness of the assessment of the goods…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492