| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2022 SLG 758 2022 SLD 758 2022 PTD 779 2022 PTCL 863 |
Sindh High Court
C.P. No. D-5596 and Special Customs Reference Application No. 246 of 2020, decided on 7-12-2021, Date of hearing: 6-12-2021.
MUHAMMAD SHAFT SIDDIQUI, JUSTICE, MAHMOOD A. KHAN, JUSTICE
Sardar Muhammad Ishaque for Petitioner (in C.P. No.D-5596 and for
Respondent Special Customs Reference Application No.246 of 2020). Khalid Rajpar for Applicant (in Special Customs Reference Application No.246 of 2020). Kafeel Ahmed Abbasi, Deputy Attorney
C.P. No. D-5596 and Special Customs Reference Application No. 246 of 2020, decided on 7-12-2021, Date of hearing: 6-12-2021.
MUHAMMAD SHAFT SIDDIQUI, JUSTICE, MAHMOOD A. KHAN, JUSTICE
Sardar Muhammad Ishaque for Petitioner (in C.P. No.D-5596 and for
Respondent Special Customs Reference Application No.246 of 2020). Khalid Rajpar for Applicant (in Special Customs Reference Application No.246 of 2020). Kafeel Ahmed Abbasi, Deputy Attorney
MESSRS ZARIF KHAN HUSSAIN ZAI AND BROTHERS THROUGH AUTHORISED ATTORNEY/AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION/CHAIRMAN, ISLAMABAD AND OTHERS
Law: Customs Act, 1969
Section: 80,196
Customs Act (IV of 1969)---Ss.80 , 196 Import Policy Order, 2016, Cl. 9(H)(5) Goods declaration Report from manufacturer, absence of Factual controversy Customs authorities passed order of confiscation of vehicles in question on the plea that those were more than 5 years old and not importable in terms of Para 9(5) of Import Policy Order, 2016 Customs Appellate Tribunal set aside the order passed by authorities Validity Pre-shipment Certificate disclosed the model year as 2012, which was importable when goods declarations were filed Vehicles were not older than five years at the time of import in terms of pre-shipment certificate Challenge to such certificate as far as model year was concerned was a factual controversy which was not mandate of High Court under Reference jurisdiction under S.196 of Customs Act, 1969 No evidence of any nature was filed by authorities to disclose that manufacturer had disclosed year of its manufacture as other than 2012 Entering into such debate at reference stage was not permissible under law unless satisfactory evidence was available on record Report relied upon by authorities was not of the manufacturer from Japan but was of a local assembler In presence of requisite document, as required under Import Policy Order, 2016, letter of local assembler could only be an extraneous material High Court declined to interfere in the order passed by Customs Appellate Tribunal as it had rightly not taken it into consideration Reference was dismissed in circumstances. JUDGMENT: MUHAMMAD SHAFI SIDDIQUI, JUSTICE:---.--- Through this common judgment we intend to dispose of Special Customs Reference Application under section 196 of Customs Act, 1969 and the connected petition as they involve common questions and for the sake of convenience the Reference Application is being treated as leading matter and the answer to the questions proposed in the Reference will decide the fate of the petition as well, which was filed for compliance/implementation of Tribunal’s order. 2. Respondent imported two used Hino Concrete Transit” Mixer Trucks YOM 2012…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492