Case Details

Citation(s)
2022 SLG 360 2022 SLD 360 2022 PCRLJ 101
Peshawar High Court
Writ Petition No. 4576-P of 2020, decision dated: 27-04-2021. hearing date: 27-04-2021.
LAL, JAN KHATTAK, JUSTICE, SYED ARSHAD ALI, JUSTICE
Barrister Syed Mudasser Ameer, Manzoor Khan Khalil and Akhunzada Asad Iqbal for Petitioner. Syed Azeem Dad, ADPG, Muhammad Ali and Haider Ali, Special Public Prosecutors for NAB.

MUHAMMAD SAFDAR

VS

CHAIRMAN NAB AND 3 OTHERS

Law: National Accountability Ordinance, 1999

Section: 9(a)(v)

(a) National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999)--- ----S. 9 (a)(v)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Assets beyond known sources of income---Determination---High Court while exercising Constitutional jurisdiction pertaining to grant or otherwise of bail before arrest cannot hold whether a particular asset has come to holder of public office or to any other person through his known legal sources of income or otherwise. (b) National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999)--- ----Ss. 9(a)(v) 9(b)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Pre-arrest bail, grant of---Mala fide---Presumption of innocence--- Petitioner was accused of holding assets beyond known sources of his income---Plea raised by petitioner was despite repeated appearances, National Accountability Bureau (NAB) had been calling him time and again due to mala fide reasons---Validity---High Court while exercising its Constitutional jurisdiction was to see whether or not there was anymala fide on the part of NAB authorities to arrest accused and whether or not a prima facie case for grant of extra ordinary concession of admitting him to bail before arrest was made out---If Constitutional Court in the light of record had reached to the conclusion that mala fide was reflected from intended NAB’s move to arrest accused and latter also succeeded in setting up a prima facie case in his favour then in such like situation, it was primary duty and legal obligation of Court to grant relief to the citizen so that he could be protected from unjust and arbitrary arrest---If despite element of mala fide on the part of NAB to nab accused, the latter was not admitted to bail before arrest and allowed to be grilled by the former’s investigators for maximum period of 90 days by putting him behind the bars then centuries old jurisprudence developed by Courts of law regarding presumption of innocence of accused unless proven guilty would die down and would be meaningless---In response to various call up notices, petitioner appeared before Combined Investigation Team and presented before it his point of view regarding allegations pertaining to accumulation of assets beyond his known…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492