Case Details

Citation(s)
2022 SLG 2367 2022 SLD 2367 2022 PLC 1374
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 465 of 2021, decided on 28th September, 2021.
GULZAR AHMED, C.J., MAZHAR ALAM KHAN MIANKHEL AND MUHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR, JJ
Naeem Jan, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant. Shumail Aziz, Additional A.G. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Abdul Samad, Dy. Dire. E&S Education Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Shakirullah Khan, SO (Lit) Finance, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa for
Respondents.

FIDA MUHAMMAD

VS

GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Secretary Education, Peshawar and others

Law:

Section:

(a) Civil service--- ----Upgradation of post---Scope---Upgradation could not be claimed as a matter of right but was in fact based on a policy decision of the competent authority jotted down in a scheme/notification for its implementation across the board for particular categories of employees who fulfilled the required qualification which was normally a particular length of service in a particular pay scale. (b) Civil service--- ----Upgradation of post and promotion---Distinction---Promotion involved advancement in rank, grade or a footstep en route for advancement to higher position whereas the facility or benefit of upgradation simply conferred some monetary benefits by granting a higher pay scale to ventilate stagnation---Up-gradation was carried out under a policy and specified scheme---In an upgradation, the candidate continued to hold the same post without any change in his duties but he was accorded a higher pay scale---Benefit of upgradation was normally granted to persons stuck-up in one pay-scale for considerable period of their length of service either having no venue for promotion or progression---Up-gradation under a scheme was personal to the incumbents of the posts---In order to minimize the anguish or suffering of being stuck-up in particular pay scale for a sizeable period, the mechanism of up-gradation as a policy decision was used for redressal. Regional Commissioner Income Tax v. Syed Munawar Ali 2016 SCMR 859 and Federal Public Service Commission through Secretary v. Anwar-ul-Haq (Private Secretary) Islamabad and others 2017 SCMR 890 ref. Date of hearing: 28th September, 2021. JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR, J.---This civil appeal is directed against the judgment passed by learned Peshawar High Court in W.P. No.2370-P/2018 whereby the writ petition was dismissed. 2. The short-lived facts of the case are as under:- The appellant was appointed as CT in (BPS-09) on 15.09.1987. He was promoted to the post of SET/SST (BPS-16) on 24.07.2003. He reached to the age of superannuation on 04.05.2016 after qualifying 29 years of service and his pension was calculated on the basis of his last pay in BPS-16. The appellant lodged his grievance that he was…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492