Case Details

Citation(s)
2023 SLG 1590 2023 CLC 1131 2023 SLD 1590
Lahore High Court
R.F.A. No.74319 of 2021, hea.d on 9th March, 2022. Date of hearing: 9th March, 2022.
Before Safdar Saleem Shahid, J
Muhammad Ijaz and another v. Muhammad Shafi through L.Rs. 2016 SCMR 834 ref. Muhammad Ahsan Bhoon, Hamid Iftikhar Pannu, Azmat Bashir Tarar, Khalid Pervaiz Warraich and Ch. Numan Mustafa Bajwa for Appellant. Sh. Naveed Shahryar, Humera Bashir, Saira Tuf

SALEEM MEHMOOD----Appellant

VERSUS

Ch. SAEED ASGHAR----Respondent

Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Section: 1,2

(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O.XXXVII Rr.1, 2 Form IV of Appendix B----Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Art.159---Services, when properly effected---Limitation, commencement of----Copy of plaint----Purpose---Duty of Court--- Respondent /plaintiff filed suit for recovery of amount on basis of cheque before Trial Court---Appellant/defendant filed leave to defend---Trial Court rejected the said application for leave to defend---Validity---Suit filed by the respondent being summary in nature under O.XXXVII of the C.P.C., summonses were required to be issued on Form IV of Appendix B ,C.P.C and it was imperative that copy of the plaint and all the annexures should be sent to the defendant along with the summons and without fulfillment of that requirement, it could not be held that services was properly effected---Even if the defendant had been served with summons, without copy of plaint, and he had been appearing before the Court, the limitation would not run till the time he was supplied with a copy of the plaint for the reason that only on provision of copy of plaint he would gain knowledge as to what nature of suit was pending against him---Appellant/defendant, could not be served through summons, but he was served through publication of notice in the newspaper---Even on appellants appearance before the Court, through his counsel, appellant was not provided a copy of the plaint and annexures; it was the responsibility of the plaintiff/respondent to provide copy of the plaint along with annexures to the defendant/appellant and not that of defendant/appellant to demand a copy thereof---Purpose behind issuance of summons along with copy of the plaint and the annexures was that the defendant/appellant should have gained knowledge of pendency and nature of suit against him ---Appeal was allowed and the case was remanded for decision afresh, after affording opportunity of hearing to the both parties in accordance with law. Khushi Muhammad v. Muzammal Khatoon and 10 others 2014 YLR 1779 and Abdul Karim v. Nazir Ahmad PLD 1998 Lah. 163 rel. (b) Limitation Act (IX of 1908)--- ----Art.159---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XXXVII, Rr.12---Suit for recovery ofโ€ฆ
๐Ÿ”’
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492