| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2021 SLG 242 2021 SLD 242 2021 CLC 408 |
Peshawar High Court, Abbottabad Bench
Civil Revision No. 02-A of 2014, decided on 10th September, 2020, Date of hearing: 10th September, 2020.
SHAKEEL AHMAD, JUSTICE
Muhammad Ayub Awan for Petitioner. Sajjad Ahmad Abbasi for
Respondent.
Civil Revision No. 02-A of 2014, decided on 10th September, 2020, Date of hearing: 10th September, 2020.
SHAKEEL AHMAD, JUSTICE
Muhammad Ayub Awan for Petitioner. Sajjad Ahmad Abbasi for
Respondent.
HAJI MOHAMMAD RIAZ AND ANOTHERS
VS
KHALID MEHMOOD ABBASI AND OTHERS
Law: Specific Relief Act, 1877
Section: 42,54
Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----Ss. 42 54---Suit for declaration and injunction---Graveyard, private or public---Determining factors---Plaintiffs claimed that land in question was graveyard and revenue entries in the name of defendants were wrong---Validity---Rules to determine as to whether a graveyard was a public or a private one were (i) even though there was no direct evidence of dedication to public, it could be presumed to be a public graveyard by immemorial user i.e. where the corpses of the members of Muslim community had been buried in a particular graveyard for a large number of years without any objection from the owners. The fact that owner permitted such burials did not make any difference at all; (ii) if graveyard was a private or a family graveyard then it should contain graves of only the founder, members of his family or his descendents and no others. Once even in a family graveyard members of public were allowed to bury their dead, the private graveyard would shed its character and became public graveyard; (iii) in order to prove that graveyard was public dedication it must be shown by multiplying instances of the character, nature and extent of buries form time to time---In other words there should be evidence to show that a large number of members of Muslim community had buried their corpses from time to time in the graveyard. Once such was found, then Court was to presume that graveyard was a public one; and (iv) where burial ground was mentioned as public graveyard in either a revenue record or historic papers that would be conclusive proof of a public character of a graveyard---Sale or purchase if any made in suit land either through mutation or registered deed was illegal, without lawful authority and without jurisdiction and the same was liable to be cancelled---High Court directed revenue officials to rectify revenue record and concurrent s and decrees passed by two Courts below were set aside---Revision was allowed accordingly. Ulfat Butt v. Muhammad Arif and others 2000 YLR 2753 and Sheo Raj Chamar and another v. Mudeer Khan and others AIR 1934 Allahabad 868 rel. JUDGMENT SHAKEEL AHMAD, JUSTICE:---.--- The instant…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492