Case Details

Citation(s)
2022 SLG 391 2022 SLD 391 2022 PLC 139
Peshawar High Court
Writ Petition No. 3695-P of 2019, decision dated:29-09-2021. hearing date: 21st September, 2021.
ROOH UL AMIN KHAN, JUSTICE, SYED MUHAMMAD ATTIQUE SHAH, JUSTICE
Arshad Ahmad, A.A.G., Barrister Waqar Ali Khan, Muhammad Ijaz Sabi and Muhammad Esa Khan Khalil for
Respondents.

MUHAMMAD NASIR THROUGH PRESIDENT ENGINEER AND OTHERSVSGOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Law:

Section:

Peshawar Development Authority Act (XXXI of 2017)--- ----S.8---Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Provincial Urban Development Board Employees Service Rules, 1978, R.4(j)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199---Constitutional petition---Appointment in Peshawar Development Authority (PDA)---Lateral entry/deputations were aggrieved of filling of promotion posts through deputationists---Validity---Peshawar Development Authority was empowered under Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Provincial Urban Development Board Employees Service Rules, 1978, for appointment to a post on ‘Lateral Entry’ which meant inviting employees from anywhere into the service of PDA---Such power and discretion could be exercised in case of dire need of borrowing department coupled with the consent of lending department, that too, in a situation when no fit and suitable employee would commensurate to such post available in borrowing department---No such exercise was undertaken, rather Provincial Government or Establishment Department imposed a good number of blue eyed officers upon borrowing department (PDA) to indispensably accept their services on deputation basis---Posting of outsiders on the basis of deputation created unrest and sense of deprivation amongst employees already working there---High Court declared practice of such appointments on deputation basis against justice, equity and good governance---Discretionary powers were not unbridled or unfettered but such discretion was required by law to be exercised in judicial manner on sound judicial principles---High Court further declared orders of respondents and other issued during pendency of petition whereby they were transferred to PDA on deputation or on pretext of ‘Later Entry’ as illegal, without lawful authority and were set aside---Constitutional petition was allowed accordingly. Dr. Muhammad Amin v. President Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited 2010 SCMR 1458; Human Rights Case No. 8340, 9604-G, 1396-G, 13635-P and 14306-G to 143309-G of 2009; Walayat Ali Mir v. Pakistan International Airlines Corporation 1995 SCMR 650; Brig. Muhammad Bashir v. Abdul Karim and others PLD 2004 SC 271 and Contempt Proceedings against Chief Secretary Sindh and others 2013 SCMR 1752…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492