Case Details

Citation(s)
2022 SLG 394 2022 SLD 394 2022 PLC 164
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeals Nos. 249, 250, 255 and 257 of 2020 and Civil Appeals Nos. 273, 285, 289 and 301 of 2020, decision dated: 21st April, 2021. hearing date: 25th November, 2020. (Against judgment dated 04.10.2017, 22.11.2017, 25.10.2017, 04.10.2017, 29.11.2018,
IJAZ UL AHSAN, JUSTICE, MUNIB AKHTAR, JUSTICE
Shumail Ahmad Butt, A.G., Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Atif Ali Khan, Additional A.G., Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Barrister Qasim Wadood, Additional A.G., Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Iram Shaheen, DD, HED, Asif Khan, Litigation Officer, HED, Amin Jan, AD Fisheries, Gulzar Mahmoo

GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA THROUGH SECRETARY AGRICULTURE, LIVESTOCK AND COOPERATIVE DEPARTMENT PESHAWAR AND OTHERS

VS

SAEEDULHASSAN AND OTHErs

Law: Companies Act, 2017

Section: 42

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 199

(a) Civil service--- ----Contract/project posts---Termination from service on completion of projects---High Court ordering reinstatement and regularization of project employees---Legality---Policy for the projects in question stated that the employees, who were employed in a project, would stand terminated, on the completion of the project---Only exception was that the said employees would be re-appointed on need basis if the project was extended over any new phase or phases---Record revealed that the respondents were terminated after the projects in which they were appointed came to an end or, were converted to the regular side---Appointments on the regular and newly created posts was to be made through advertisement and open competition through a transparent process via the Provincial Public Service Commission---Thus, former project employees could not claim regularization as a matter of right---Furthermore, it had been specifically mentioned in the appointment orders of the respondents/employees that they could not claim regularization and further, that they were employed on contract for a specific period of time---High Court could not have altered, amended or renegotiated the terms and conditions of the appointment orders of the respondents/employees for the simple reason that it did not have jurisdiction to do so---Appeals were allowed and impugned s of the High Court ordering reinstatement and regularization of respondents/employees in service were set aside. (b) Civil service--- ----Contract/project posts---Regularization in service, right of---Scope---Long or satisfactory contractual service did not confer a vested right for regularization as conversion from contractual to regular appointment required statutory support---Creation of a post or posts on the regular side did not confer, in the absence of any statutory support, an automatic right of regularization in favour of the employees employed on contractual basis against project posts. (c) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 199---Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court---Scope---Jurisdiction of the High Court was to interpret the law, test its vires on the touchstone of the Constitution and…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492