| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2022 SLG 3204 2022 SLD 3204 2022 PCRLJ 1293 |
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No. 27790 of 2021, heard on 3rd March, 2022.
TARIQ SALEEM SHEIKH, J
Hassan Iqbal Warraich for Petitioner. Mudassar Elahi Warraich, Assistant Advocate General, with Dr. Awais Gohar, Additional Secretary Technical, Mohsin Ehsan and Aleem Cheema, Law Officers, PSHD and Dr. Ghulam Shabbir Tahir, Medical Superintendent, DHQ H
Writ Petition No. 27790 of 2021, heard on 3rd March, 2022.
TARIQ SALEEM SHEIKH, J
Hassan Iqbal Warraich for Petitioner. Mudassar Elahi Warraich, Assistant Advocate General, with Dr. Awais Gohar, Additional Secretary Technical, Mohsin Ehsan and Aleem Cheema, Law Officers, PSHD and Dr. Ghulam Shabbir Tahir, Medical Superintendent, DHQ H
MARATAB MUKHTAR
VS
GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB and others
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 464,465
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 302,148,149
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----Ss. 464 465---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302, 148 149---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Qatl-i-amd, rioting armed with deadly weapons, unlawful assembly---Application of petitioner for constituting Provincial Standing Medical Board had been turned down by the Magistrate---Scope claimed that he sustained firearm injuries at the hands of respondent who was armed with .30-bore pistol---Medico-Legal Certificate of the petitioner issued by Medical Officer showed that injuries were caused by firearm challenged that Medico-Legal Certificate before the Area Magistrate who ordered the petitioner’s re-examination by the District Standing Medical Board---Said District Standing Medical Board gave an opinion that the injuries were not by firearm moved the Magistrate for making a reference to the Provincial Standing Medical Board---Magistrate declined the request---Validity had alleged that one of the respondents exerted political pressure on the District Standing Medical Board to procure the impugned report but had not furnished any details---Allegation was, therefore, rejected being vague and unsubstantiated---District Standing Medical Board’s opinion was deficient in material particulars---Firstly, it had mentioned that the petitioner’s clothes which he wore at the time of the incident did not relate to the use of firearm but had not explained how---Secondly, there was no suggestion that the petitioner’s injuries were fabricated---District Standing Medical Board had not stated what type of weapon could have been possibly employed if it was not firearm---As adumbrated, that was a case of two versions, one set out in the FIR by said respondent and the other by the petitioner’s side---Reference to the Provincial Standing Medical Board was necessary to dig out the truth which was the basic object of every inquiry and trial---Petition was accepted and re-examination of the petitioner by the Provincial Standing Medical Board was ordered, in circumstances. Muhammad Rizwan v. The State and others 2017 MLD 1828; State of Himachal Pradesh v. Jai Lal and others (1999) 7 SCC 280; State of Haryana v. Bhagirath and others AIR 1999 SC…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492