Case Details

Citation(s)
2021 SLG 584 2021 SLD 584 2021 SCMR 302
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Petition No. 96-P of 2020, decided on 19th November, 2020, Date of hearing: 19th November, 2020. (On appeal against the judgment Dated 20-07-2020 passed by the Peshawar High Court, Peshawar, in Criminal Misc. (B.A.) No. 1849-P of 2020)
MUSHIR ALAM, SARDAR, JUSTICE, TARIQ MASOOD, JUSTICE, MAZHAR ALAM KHAN MIANKHEL, JUSTICE
Ghulam Mohy-ud-Din Malik, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioners. Zakir Hayat, Advocate Supreme Court along with
Respondent No. 1 for
Respondents. Arshad Hussain Yousafzai, Advocate Supreme Court and Akram, Inspector for the State.

MST. ASIA QASEEM AND OTHERS

VS

ALAMZEB AND ANOTHER

Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Section: 497(5)

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 302,148,149

Law: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Arms Act, (XXIII of 2013)

Section: 15

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497(5)---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302, 148 149---Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Arms Act (XXIII of 2013), S. 15---Qatl-i-amd, rioting armed with deadly weapons, unlawful assembly, possessing unlicensed weapon---Bail, cancellation of---Mainly three grounds prevailed with the High Court while granting bail to accused: Firstly, High Court observed that six persons were charged for commission of offence but the deceased had only two entry wounds, which was factually incorrect as deceased persons received more than two injuries which commensurated with the number of the accused, secondly the High court observed that although arms and ammunitions were recovered from the accused but the same were not sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) hence the recovery lost its relevance, said observation was also against the record as empties were sent to the FSL whereas the recovered weapons from the accused and other co-accused persons were also sent there and report of FSL revealed that some of the empties recovered from the spot were found to have been fired from the weapons recovered from the accused and other co-accused persons and thirdly the complainant in her statement under S. 164, Cr.P.C. had also involved some other co-accused persons but she had not exonerated the accused and others who were apprehended at the spot red-handed--- Consequently the grounds on which bail was granted to the accused by the High Court were not borne out from the record---Bail granting order was against the record and perverse hence liable to be set aside---Petition for leave to appeal was converted into appeal and allowed, and the bail granted to accused was cancelled. ORDER SARDAR TARIQ MASOOD, J.--- The legal heirs of the deceased persons filed this petition against the impugned judgment of the Peshawar High Court, Peshawar through which post-arrest bail was granted to Respondent No.1 Alamzeb vide judgment dated 20.07.2020 in case FIR No.411 dated 10.5.2020 registered under sections 302/148/149 of the Pakistan Penal Code (P.P.C.) read with section 15AA at Police Station MPS Sadar, Mardan. 2. The brief facts of the case are that police…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492