Case Details

Citation(s)
2023 SLG 2068 2023 SLD 2068 2023 YLR 1227 2023 SLD
Sindh High Court
Criminal Jail Appeal No. D-51, Criminal Appeal No.D-52 andConfirmation Case No. 5 of 2016, decided on 24th June,2021. Date of hearing: 10th June, 2021.
Before Mohammad Karim Khan Agha and Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, JJ
Syed Zeeshan Shah for Appellants. Ms. Sana Memon, A.P.G. Sindh for
Respondent. Ayatullah Khowaja for the Complainant.

MANSOOR AHMED and others---Appellants

VERSUS

The STATE---Respondents

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 302(b)

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Ocular account supported by medical evidence---Scope---Accused was charged that he along with his co-accused made firing upon the complainant party, due to which one person died while two were injured---Dispute on the rotation of water for irrigating the land was motive behind the occurrence---Ocular account had been furnished by three eye-witnesses---All the three eye-witnesses deposed against the accused with specific role of causing fire shots from their respective weapons upon the deceased---Two of the eye-witnesses received firearm injuries at the scene and as such their presence had been established---Evidence of all three eye-witnesses was found to be reliable, trustworthy and confidence inspiring---All the three eye-witnesses were consistent on each and every point and were cross-examined by the defence but they were on one line and fully supported the case of prosecution---All three eye-witnesses knew accused persons and had a good look at the accused persons from close range---No doubt that the eye-witnesses had correctly identified the accused persons, especially as they had no reason to implicate them in a false case---In the circumstances no identification parade was required with respect to accused persons who were named and given a specific role in the FIR---No material contradiction was pointed out by the defence---Ocular evidence furnished by the eye-witnesses was further corroborated by the medical evidence and other circumstantial evidence---Circumstances established that the prosecution had proved its case against the accused beyond a reasonable doubt by producing independent, trustworthy, reliable and confidence-inspiring evidence---Appeal against conviction was dismissed accordingly. Muhammad Rafique alias Feeqa v. The State 2019 SCMR 1068; Zahir Shah v. The State 2019 MLD 1562; Abdul Jabbar v. The State 2019 YLR 1073; Bilal v. The State 2019 PCr.LJ 401; Muhammad Asif v. The State 2019 MLD 1197; Mst. Sughra Begum and another v. Qaiser Pervez and others 2015 SCMR 1142; Mehr Ali and others v. The State 1968 SCMR 161; Akhtar Saleem and another v. The State…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492