| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2022 SLG 1791 2022 SLD 1791 2022 PLJ 52 |
Supreme Court (AJ&K)
C.A. No. 51 of 2020, decided on 8.11.2021. (On appeal from the judgment of the High Court dated 26.6.2019 in Civil Appeal No. 80 of 2016)
KH. MUHAMMAD NASIM AND RAZA ALI KHAN, JJ.
Mr. Kamran Tariq, Advocate for Appellant. Miss Nosheen Iqbal, Advocate for
Respondents.
C.A. No. 51 of 2020, decided on 8.11.2021. (On appeal from the judgment of the High Court dated 26.6.2019 in Civil Appeal No. 80 of 2016)
KH. MUHAMMAD NASIM AND RAZA ALI KHAN, JJ.
Mr. Kamran Tariq, Advocate for Appellant. Miss Nosheen Iqbal, Advocate for
Respondents.
NASEEM AKHTAR--Appellant
VS
MUKHTAR BEGUM and others
Law: Specific Relief Act, 1877
Section: 42,39
Law: Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)
Section: 127
Specific Relief Act, 1877 (I of 1877)-- ----Ss. 42 , 39--Suit for declaration and cancellation of gift deed to extent of appellant’s share--Concurrent findings--Gift-deed--Burden of proof--Validity of gift-deed--Obtaining of gift deed by fraud--Responsibility of donee--Pardnasheen lady--Challenge to--Shifting of onus to defendants--Assertion of plaintiff--Assertion of plaintiff, being a pardanasheen lady, was sufficient enough to shift onus on defendant-respondents to prove authenticity of disputed gift-deed--Courts below including High Court have failed to apply correct law on subject and reached at wrong conclusion--Courts below have concurrently recorded findings, but these findings are suffering from misreading and non-reading of record and evidence as well as incorrect application of law on subject--Same are liable to be set aside--We do not find any reason assigned in said gift-deed as to why gift-deed is being executed in favour of respondents--It was basic responsibility of donee to prove that donor had intention to gift property to them for so specific reasons--Appeal accepted. [Pp. 59 , 60] C, D , E , F PLD 2003 AJK 25 ref. Execution of document-- ----Where executant of a document is an illiterate Pardanasheen lady, burden of proving due execution of such document is upon person, who is beneficiary of such document. [P. 56] A 1989 CLC 1584 ref. Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984 (10 of 1984)-- ----Art. 127--Genuineness of document--If genuineness of a document purported to be executed by a Pardanasheen lady is disputed by her, in such state of affairs, person relies on document has to prove good faith and genuineness of same. [P. 58] B 2005 SCMR 1859 ref. JUDGMENT Raza Ali Khan, J.--The captioned appeal by leave of the Court arises out of the judgment dated 26.6.2019, passed by the learned High Court of Azad Jammu , Kashmir in Civil Appeal No. 80 of 2016. 2. The brief facts forming the background of the captioned appeal are that appellant, herein, filed a suit for declaration and cancellation of gift-deed, dated 19.5.2010, against the respondents, herein, to the extent of her share measuring 31 kanal, 18 marla, and two…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492