| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2021 SLG 1594 2021 SLD 1594 2021 YLR 1613 |
Peshawar High Court
Criminal Appeal No. 730-P of 2020, decided on 25th November, 2020, Date of hearing: 26th November, 2020.
IKAMULLAH KHAN, JUSTICE, SYED MUHAMMAD ATTIQUE SHAH, JUSTICE
Noor Alam Khan and Shabina Noor for Appellant. Mujahid Ali Khan, A.A.G. for the State.
Criminal Appeal No. 730-P of 2020, decided on 25th November, 2020, Date of hearing: 26th November, 2020.
IKAMULLAH KHAN, JUSTICE, SYED MUHAMMAD ATTIQUE SHAH, JUSTICE
Noor Alam Khan and Shabina Noor for Appellant. Mujahid Ali Khan, A.A.G. for the State.
AYAZ ALIAS IMRAN
VS
THE STATE
Law: Control of Narcotics Substances Act, 1997
Section: 9(c)
(a) Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997)--- ----S. 9(c)---Possession of narcotics---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Prosecution case was that six kilograms of charas were recovered from the vehicle of the accused---Complainant stated that his personal monogram had an inscription of MK---No explanation was offered as to why the parcels did not contain the monogram of Seizing Officer, as such it had created a serious doubt regarding the seizer of contraband---Complainant admitted in his cross-examination that he kept 1/1 monogram inside each parcel---Said witness stated that if the case property had no monogram inside the parcel the same would have not been sealed by him at the spot---Fact of placing 1/1 sample monogram MK inside the parcel was also admitted by recovery witness in his cross-examination, however, when the Trial Court de-sealed the case property on the request of defence, there was no sample monogram inside the parcel---Held, in circumstances, it could not be concluded that the case property produced before the Trial Court was the same which was recovered from the vehicle---Circumstances established that the prosecution had miserably failed to prove its case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances. Akhtar Iqbal v. The State 2015 SCMR 291 rel. (b) Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997)--- ----S. 9(c)---Possession of narcotics---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Contradictions in the statements of witnesses---Scope---Prosecution case was that six kilograms of charas were recovered from the vehicle of the accused---Complainant stated that nothing was handed over to the Investigating Officer when he came to the spot for investigation---Said fact had been contradicted by recovery witness in his cross-examination by admitting that when the Investigating Officer came to the spot, case property was present on the spot---Case property including the vehicle was delivered to the Investigating Officer on the spot---Admittedly, nothing had been recovered from the accused like Driving Licence or any other document which suggested that he was driver of…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492