| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2022 SLG 1809 2022 SLD 1809 2022 PLJ 161 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Crl. A. No. 293 of 2020, decision dated: 7.2.2022. (On appeal against the judgment dated 09.03.2016 passed by the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench in Criminal Appeal No. 19-J of 2012 and Murder Reference No. 16 of 2012)
SARDAR TARIQ MASOOD, SAYYED MAZAHAR ALI AKBAR NAQVI AND, JAMAL KHAN MANDOKHAIL, JJ
Raja Muhammad Rizwan Ibrahim Satti, ASC for Appellant. Mr. Muhammad Jaffer, Additional P.G. for State.
Crl. A. No. 293 of 2020, decision dated: 7.2.2022. (On appeal against the judgment dated 09.03.2016 passed by the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench in Criminal Appeal No. 19-J of 2012 and Murder Reference No. 16 of 2012)
SARDAR TARIQ MASOOD, SAYYED MAZAHAR ALI AKBAR NAQVI AND, JAMAL KHAN MANDOKHAIL, JJ
Raja Muhammad Rizwan Ibrahim Satti, ASC for Appellant. Mr. Muhammad Jaffer, Additional P.G. for State.
BASHIR MUHAMMAD KHAN
VS
STATE
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 302(b)
Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860)-- ---S. 302(b)--Appreciation of evidence--Delay in recording statement--FSL report not match empties and recovered weapon--Abscondance--Benefit of acquittal--Acquittal of--Complainant had not seen the occurrence and nominated the appellant and co-accused on the basis of information received by the PW’s--One PW was not produced and two PW’s subsequently resiled from their earlier statements recorded u/s 161 of Cr.P.C. and testified that two co-accused had not fired upon the deceased--Complainant also exonerated the said two co-accused--Delayed in recording statements of PW u/s 161 of Cr.P.C. reduce its value--Recovery of pistol, as per report of FSL did not match the crime empties--Question of abscondance of the appellant was not put to the appellant in his statement u/s 342 Cr.P.C. is acquitted. Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860)-- ----S. 302(b)--Delayed in recording statements of PW u/s 161 of Cr.P.C. reduce its value. 2020 SCMR 1049; 1996 SCMR 1553 ref. Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860)-- ----S. 302(b)--Recovery--Recovery of pistol, as per report of FSL did not match the crime empties is held inconsequential. Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)-- ----S. 342(b)--Pakistan Penal Code, (XLV of 1860), S. 302--Abscondance--Question of abscondance of the appellant was not put to the appellant in his statement u/s 342 Cr.P.C. Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860)-- ----S. 302(b)--Benefit of doubt--Single circumstance creating reasonable doubt in a prudent mind about the guilt of the accused makes him entitled to its benefits, not as a matter of grace and concession but as a matter of right. JUDGMENT Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi, J. Bashir Muhammad Khan along with three co-accused was proceeded against in terms of the case registered vide FIR No. 387/2008 dated 29.11.2008 under Sections 302/109/34, P.P.C. at Police Station Kahuta, District Rawalpindi for committing murder of Sagheer Hussain son of the complainant. However, co-accused Muhammad Waqar and Muhammad Shahid were discharged from the case on the basis of supplementary statement of the complainant while co-accused Badshah Khan was declared proclaimed…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492