Case Details

Citation(s)
2022 SLG 430 2022 SLD 430 2022 YLR 217
Sindh High Court
Constitutional Petition No. 3507 of 2020, decision dated:24-12-2020. Dates of hearing: 4th November and 24-12-2020.
MOHAMMAD KARIM KHAN AGHA, JUSTICE, AMJAD ALI SAHITO, JUSTICE
Salman Talibuddin, Advocate General Sindh along with Muhammad Yousuf Rahpoto, Assistant Advocate General Sindh, Ali Haider Saleem, D.P.G., Gul Faraz Khatak, A.A.G., Amir Kuvshesi, Special Secretary, Baber Qadeer, AS and Aijaz Bhatti, SO, Home Department,

AHMAD OMAR SHEIKH AND 3 OTHErsVSGOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 6 OTHERS

Law:

Section:

(a) Sindh Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance (XXXI of 1960)--- ----S. 3---Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Ss. 11-EEE, 11-EE Fourth Sched.--- Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Power to arrest and detain suspected persons---Proscription of persons---Scopes challenged three separate preventive detention orders (PDOs) issued by the Provincial Government for a period of three months one after the other and a notification placing the names of petitioners on the Fourth Sched. of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997---Validitys were earlier convicted for the kidnapping and murder of an American journalist, however, later on except one all were acquitted---Upon announcement of the acquittal order, the Government issued successive PDOss, for the last 18 years, had been in jail either as under trial prisoners or convicts---During this time no material had come on record that any of the petitioners were associating themselves with any banned organization or proscribed person through prison visits, intercepts, video recordings, etc.---If the petitioners were regarded so dangerous terrorists then why were their names not put on the Fourth Sched. prior to the abduction and murder in the year 2002---Names of petitioners were only placed on the Fourth Sched. to justify their detention under S.11-EEE, Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, despite there being no material before the Provincial Government to show that any of the petitioners belonged to a banned organization or would involve himself in terrorist acts on his release---Even the reasons for placing the names of petitioners on the Fourth Sched. were spurious and without justification---Third Preventive Detention Order (PDO) was struck down as being illegal and issued without lawful authority---Notification placing the petitioners in the Fourth Sched. was also struck down as having been issued without lawful authority and on account of mala fidess were directed to be released forthwith and were not to be detained under any further PDO without the permission of the High Court---Constitutional petition was allowed, in circumstances. Muhammad Adeel v. Government of Punjab 2015 YLR 2422; Tariq Shah v.…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492