Case Details

Citation(s)
2023 SLG 2090 2023 SLD 2090 2023 YLR 1362
Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, Multan
Writ Petition No. 9926 of 2021, heard on 20th October, 2021. Date of hearing: 20th October, 2021.
Before Anwaar Hussain, J
Tariq Zulfiqar Ahmed for Petitioner. Tariq Muhammad Iqbal Chaudhry for
Respondent No.1.

MEHMOOD IDREES---Petitioner

VERSUS

KHALID HUSSAIN and 2 others---Respondents

Law: Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act, 2012

Section: 7,8

Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act, 2012 (IV of 2013)--- ----Ss. 7 & 8---Mesne profits---Question of title---Respondent/plaintiff filed suit for partition of suit property as co-sharer of joint property in possession of petitioner / defendant--- Courts below directed petitioner/defendant to deposit interim mesne profit---Plea raised by petitioner/defendant was that respondent/ plaintiff did not have title in suit property---Validity---Discretion under S. 7 of Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act, 2012, was vested in Trial Court to determine mesne profits at the first date of hearing pending adjudication of the suit whereas S. 8 of Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act, 2012, had made it imperative upon Court to decide the issue to title or dispute before proceeding further in the suit---Such would be against the intention of the Legislature and object of Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act, 2012 to circumscribe or put a lid of S. 8 of Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act, 2012, on the discretion vested in Trial Court under S. 7 of Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act, 2012, by the Legislature---Purpose was that the Court considering facts of each case could direct deposit of interim mesne profits or deny the same pending adjudication of suit to safeguard a party not in possession---Such discretion was to be exercised in a judicial manner by Trial Court in each case depending upon prima facie positions of parties with respect to co-ownership---Respondent/ plaintiff was co-owner with equal share as per Jamabandi for the year 2001-2002, which had made it a prima facie case in favour of respondent/plaintiff---Lower Appellate Court in exercise of revisional jurisdiction had rightly held that Trial Court failed in exercising its discretion in a judicial manner---If upon final adjudication of the matter, petitioner/defendant would succeed to establish his case regarding his real and sole ownership, amount so deposited as mesne profits could always be decreed in his favour---If petitioner/defendant would fail and order under S. 7 of Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act, 2012, was not in field, respondent/ plaintiff would…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492