| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2022 SLG 2408 2022 SLD 2408 2022 CLC 1048 |
Balochistan High Court
C.P. No. 287 of 2020, decided on 14th September, 2021.
MUHAMMAD EJAZ SWATIAND ZAHEER-UD-DIN KAKAR, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
C.P. No. 287 of 2020, decided on 14th September, 2021.
MUHAMMAD EJAZ SWATIAND ZAHEER-UD-DIN KAKAR, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
ABDUL RAZIQ
VS
MUHAMMAD RAFIQ and others
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: 153
(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----S.153---Pre-emption---Talb-i-Muwathibat---Date, time and place, mentioning of---Application of petitioner/pre-emptor was allowed by Trial Court for correction of mistake---Petitioner prayed that in plaint he had inadvertently mentioned “AM”, instead of “PM” due to accidental slip/omission---District Court accepted (ex-parte) revision petition of the respondent/defendant---Petitioners application for setting aside ex parte order was dismissed---Petitioner contended that correction would not cause prejudice to respondents; that contents of plaint supported petitioners version regarding error being accidental; that Trial Courts order was not a “case decided”---Held, that if an interim order was a final order relating to a part of proceedings/issue and having effect on merits of the case, such an order could be corrected in revisional jurisdiction---Court had general power to amend any defect/error in any proceedings in a suit at any time to determine real question/issue---Correction of error/mistake would depend on nature of mistake/error as per the facts of each case---Mentioning of particulars as to date, time and place of making talb of pre-emption was essential for substantiating such right and failure would be fatal and pre-emptor would face the consequence of omission---Such omission if allowed to be corrected/amended it would change the nature/complexion of the suit---Petitioner did not choose to seek correction until the said facts was not specifically denied by the respondents in the written statements, and that too for correction of time as “12 PM” instead of “12:30 AM” with an object to withdraw the admission made in the plaint and wipe out the defence taken by the respondent, hence not with bona fide intention---Constitutional petition was dismissed accordingly. Rana Muhammad Tufail v. Munir Ahmed and others PLD 2001 SC 13; Muhammad Ismail v. Muhammad Yousaf 2012 SCMR 92; Mst. RoohAfza v. Aurangzeb and others 2015 SCMR 92; Ghulam Yasin and others v. Ajab Gul 2013 SCMR 23; Abaid Ullah Malik v. Additional District Judge Minawali and others PLD 2013 SC 239 and Mian Pir Muhammad and others v. Faqir Muhammad and…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492