| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2021 SLG 1130 2021 SLD 1130 2021 SCMR 1834 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 469 of 2021, decided on 10th September, 2021, Date of hearing: 10th September, 2021. (Against the judgment Dated 07.08.2019 passed by Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad in A.525(P)CS/2016
IJAZ UL AHSAN, JUSTICE, MUHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR, JUSTICE
Burhan Latif Khaisori, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant. Syed Nayab Hasan Gardezi, DAG and Muhammad Sultan, AD Legal for
Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 469 of 2021, decided on 10th September, 2021, Date of hearing: 10th September, 2021. (Against the judgment Dated 07.08.2019 passed by Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad in A.525(P)CS/2016
IJAZ UL AHSAN, JUSTICE, MUHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR, JUSTICE
Burhan Latif Khaisori, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant. Syed Nayab Hasan Gardezi, DAG and Muhammad Sultan, AD Legal for
Respondents.
MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE
VS
THE ADDITIONAL FINANCE SECRETARY (BUDGET) GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD AND ANOTHER
Law: Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973
Section: 4(1)(b)(i)
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 10A
(a) Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973 [since repealed]--- ----R. 4(1)(b)(i)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 10A---Malpractice, misconduct and misuse of official decision---Major penalty of reduction to lower post--- Whether employee (appellant) was provided a proper right of defence during inquiry proceedings---Held, that departmental proceeding against the appellant was initiated on issuing show cause notice with the statement of allegations, the appellant submitted reply to the show cause notice and since his reply was not found satisfactory, therefore, an impartial domestic inquiry was conducted against him---During the inquiry proceedings, ample opportunity was afforded to the appellant, his statement was also recorded and before taking disciplinary action, second show cause notice was also issued to him---Even in the departmental appeal, the right of audience was provided by the appellate authority to the appellant---Right to a fair hearing and or trial necessitated that a person should be afforded a fair opportunity to defend the inquiry or trial against him---In the present case, it was clearly manifesting from the record that proper right of defence was provided to the appellant in the inquiry proceedings before taking disciplinary action---No bias, unfairness or partiality was alleged or pointed out against the inquiry committee which might have any element to cause prejudice or setback to the case of appellant during inquiry---Appeal was dismissed and major penalty of reduction to lower post was maintained. (b) Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1973 [since repealed]--- ----R. 4(1)(b)(i)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 10A---Employee of National Saving Center---Unauthorized and illegal checking and retention of prize bonds---Major penalty of reduction to lower post---Plea that that no loss was caused to the government or the public exchequer as the prize bond, which won the prize was not encashed by the appellant---Held, that record showed that encashment was immediately stopped when the scam was disclosed to the higher management---Since present case was one of misconduct, the plea of non-encashment of…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492