Case Details

Citation(s)
2022 SLG 439 2022 SLD 439 2022 YLR 336
Lahore High Court
Civil Miscellaneous No. 3027 of 2015 in Civil Revision No.1200 of 2002, decision dated: 6-09-2021. hearing date:17-06-2021.
AHMAD NADEEM ARSHAD, JUSTICE
Mian Tahir Iqbal, Syed Zulfiqar Ali Bukhari, Hafiz Muhammad Riaz Mian and Mirza Aziz Akbar Baig for
Respondents.

ALLAH DITTA AND OTHErsVSMUHAMMAD ANWAR AND OTHERS

Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Section: 12(2)

(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----S. 12(2)---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 31---Fraud and collusion---Maxim “Nullus Commodum Capere Potest De Injuria Sua Propria” (No man shall take advantage of his own wrong)---Certain respondents instituted suit for possession through pre-emption regarding the suit property against one respondent which was dismissed by the Trial Court on the ground of non-fulfilment of necessary Talbs in accordance with law---Appeal was also dismissed by appellate Court---Said respondents filed civil revision before High Court---During pendency of the said civil revision, said respondents settled their disputes by way of compromise and some of the respondents withdrew their revision by filing a written application---On basis of such compromise and withdrawal, High Court decreed their suit for possession through pre-emption---One respondent transferred the suit property through oral mutation of exchange in favour of predecessor of the applicants of instant application through the said application under S. 12(2), C.P.C. challenged the validity of the said order of High Court---Validity---Predecessor of applicants got the suit property through mutation of exchange and his rights were directly affected through the / order of High Court whereby the suit of the respondents was decreed on the basis of compromise, therefore, applicants had every right to file the application under S.12(2) of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 who transferred the suit property during the proceedings of prior revision petition moved an application before this High Court whereby he acknowledged the sanction of mutation of exchange meaning thereby that at the time of execution of special power of attorney at the time of moving civil petition, and at the time of the decision of the revision petition on the basis of compromise, said respondent was not the owner of the suit property and had not possessed any interest in the suit property, therefore, his admission or statement regarding acceptance of the civil revision had no sanctity in the eye of law deliberately/ knowingly concealed material facts regarding appeals, revisions, and revision of revision (ROR) in…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492