| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2022 SLG 945 2022 SLD 945 2022 SCMR 1102 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Appeal No. 416 of 2020, decision Dated: 18-10-2021, hearing Date : 18-10-2021 (Against the judgment Dated 23.04.2015 of the Lahore High Court Bahawalpur Bench passed in Cr. Appeal No. 125 of 2014)
UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JUSTICE, SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH, JUSTICE, QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, JUSTICE
Fakhar Hayat, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant. Mirza Abid Majeed, Deputy Prosecutor General Punjab for the State.
Criminal Appeal No. 416 of 2020, decision Dated: 18-10-2021, hearing Date : 18-10-2021 (Against the judgment Dated 23.04.2015 of the Lahore High Court Bahawalpur Bench passed in Cr. Appeal No. 125 of 2014)
UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JUSTICE, SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH, JUSTICE, QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, JUSTICE
Fakhar Hayat, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant. Mirza Abid Majeed, Deputy Prosecutor General Punjab for the State.
GHULAM ABBAS
VS
THE STATE
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 336-B
Law: Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)
Section: 122
(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)---S. 336-B---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 22---Hurt by corrosive substance (acid)---Test identification parade not required where victim identifies the accused---Plea of accused that muffled description of accused narrated in the First Information Report in the absence of a test identification parade was fatal to the prosecution case---Validity---Occurrence took place inside the mosque and the victim while in the witness-box unhesitatingly pointed his finger on the culpability of the accused---Extensive burn injuries with instant impact certainly debilitated the victim with suspended faculties; it is but obvious that he was not in a position to communicate with the complainant---Absence of accused’s name in itself amply demonstrated that no deliberations or consultations were made before registration of the case---Multiple burn injuries, extensive in nature, involving different parts of body rule out the possibility of an accident or self-infliction---Victim survived the assault and, thus, was able to disclose assailant’s identity, a circumstance which was confidence inspiring and, thus, required no test identification parade, as he himself identified his assailant---Motive was not a constituent of the crime and the complainant or victim could have trotted out many but they preferred none---View concurrently taken by the trial Judge as well as the High Court on accused’s culpability for having targeted the victim with acid was not open to any legitimate exception---Conviction and sentence of accused under section 336-B of P.P.C. was maintained---Appeal was partly allowed. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 336-B---Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), S. 7(c)---Hurt by corrosive substance (acid)---Acid thrown on a victim inside a mosque---Conviction of accused under section 7(c) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 was set-aside, however his conviction under section 336-B of P.P.C. was maintained---Appeal was partly allowed. JUDGMENT: QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, JUSTICE:---.--- Muhammad Ashraf (PW-2) was in the village mosque when on 3.8.2013 the appellant splashed acid on his body, as a result whereof, he sustained nine burn…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492