| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2021 SLG 2796 2021 SLD 2796 2021 PLC 968 |
Sindh High Court
Suit No.1258 of 2010, decided on 6th July, 2020, Dates of hearing: 30th September and 10th October, 2019.
MUHAMMAD FAISAL KAMAL ALAM, JUSTICE
Abrar Hassan Mehreen Ebrahim and S. Masroor Ahmed Alvi for Plaintiff. Chaudhry Muhammad Ashraf Khan for Defendant.
Suit No.1258 of 2010, decided on 6th July, 2020, Dates of hearing: 30th September and 10th October, 2019.
MUHAMMAD FAISAL KAMAL ALAM, JUSTICE
Abrar Hassan Mehreen Ebrahim and S. Masroor Ahmed Alvi for Plaintiff. Chaudhry Muhammad Ashraf Khan for Defendant.
DR. ISHAQUE MUHAMMAD SHAH
VS
NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH PRESIDENT
Law: National Bank of Pakistan (Staff) Services Rules, 1980
Section: 18
Law: National Bank of Pakistan (Staff) Rules, 1973
Section: 17
National Bank of Pakistan (Staff) Service Rules, 1980--- ----R.18---National Bank of Pakistan (Staff) Service Rules, 1973, R.17---Suit for declaration and recovery of damages---Superannuation---Removal from service---Plaintiff was aggrieved of end of his service without issuance any prior notice---Validity---Upon attaining sixtieth year of his age employees employment was to come to an end under Rr.17 18 of National Bank of Pakistan (Staff) Service Rules, 1973 and 1980 respectively--- Notice for removal from service ended employment of plaintiff as he attained retiring age for which no prior notice was required as every employee was in knowledge of his retirement age---Plaintiff was not separated from defendant Bank as a result of any disciplinary proceedings for which any prior show cause notice or any domestic proceedings relating to misconduct was required to be issued or initiated---Plaintiff was given post retirement dues as per his entitlement---Plaintiff failed to prove violation of any service Rules by defendant Bank due to which he was deprived of any of his service / employment dues and had suffered mental torture and trauma as claimed by him, relating to post retirement period---When neither any illegality was committed nor wrong was done by defendant Bank to plaintiff, then there was no question to award liquidated or special damages against defendant Bank---Plaintiff did not bring on record that he was a regular and confirmed employee of Bank---Suit was dismissed in circumstances. Ikram Bari and 524 others v. National Bank of Pakistan through President and another 2005 SCMR 100; Izhar Ahmed Khan and another v. Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal Lahore and others 1999 SCMR 2557; Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, DG Khan and another v. Muhammad Altaf and others 2018 SCMR 325; Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education and others v. Tanveer Sajid and others 2018 SCMR 1405; Muhammad Tarim Badr and another v. National Bank of Pakistan and others 2013 SCMR 314 and Nazeer Ahmed and others v. Haji Nazeer Ali and others 2006 MLD 207 ref. JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD FAISAL KAMAL ALAM, JUSTICE:---.--- Plaintiff has instituted the present Lis challenging…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492