| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2021 SLG 2800 2021 SLD 2800 2021 PLC 1003 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 616 of 2020, decided on 20th April, 2021, Date of hearing: 2nd November, 2020. (Against judgment dated 10.04.2019 of Peshawar High Court, D.I. Khan Bench, passed in Writ Petition No. 1141-D of 2018 with C.Ms. Nos. 1301-D of 2018 and 454-D
IJAZ UL AHSAN, JUSTICE, MUNIB AKHTAR, JUSTICE
Shahid Anwar Bajwa, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant (via video link from Lahore). Raheel Zafar, S.M. Legal for Appellant. Ahmed Ali, Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 616 of 2020, decided on 20th April, 2021, Date of hearing: 2nd November, 2020. (Against judgment dated 10.04.2019 of Peshawar High Court, D.I. Khan Bench, passed in Writ Petition No. 1141-D of 2018 with C.Ms. Nos. 1301-D of 2018 and 454-D
IJAZ UL AHSAN, JUSTICE, MUNIB AKHTAR, JUSTICE
Shahid Anwar Bajwa, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant (via video link from Lahore). Raheel Zafar, S.M. Legal for Appellant. Ahmed Ali, Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondent.
PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD
VS
MUHAMMAD SAMIULLAH
Law: Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-organization) Act, 1996
Section: 35,36
Law: Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation Act, 1991
Section: 9
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199
(a) Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-Organization) Act (XVII of 1996)--- ----Ss. 35 36---Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation Act (XVIII of 1991), S. 9 [since repealed]---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court---Scope---”Master and servant” relationship---Ad hoc or temporary employees employed by the Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation (the Corporation) or the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (the Company)---Non-statutory terms and conditions of service---Distinction had to be drawn between departmental employees of the Pakistan Telegraph and Telephone Department (TT Department)whose terms and conditions of service on their transfer to the Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation (the Corporation) and then to the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (the Company)were protected by law and those who were employed by the Company on contract or work-charge basis whose terms and conditions of service were governed by the rules of the Company that were clearly non-statutory---In the present case, the respondent-employee fell squarely in the latter category as he was employed as a workman on daily wages by the Corporation in 1992 whereafter his services were regularized in 1998 and subsequently terminated---At no point in time was the respondent working in the TT department---Employees such as the respondent who were employed by the Corporation or the Company on ad hoc or temporary basis were not afforded statutory protection, and their employment was governed by the principle of master and servant---Any alleged violation of non-statutory rules was not amenable to Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court---Even otherwise, an adequate and efficacious remedy of filing a grievance petition before the Labour fora was available to the respondent, which alternate remedy he did not avail---Appeal was allowed and impugned of High Court, whereby respondent was reinstated in service, was set aside. Masood Ahmad Bhatti and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others 2012 SCMR 152; PTCL and others v. Masood Ahmad Bhatti and others 2016 SCMR 1362 and Pakistan Telecommunication Company Ltd. through Chairman v. Iqbal…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492