| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2021 SLG 2812 2021 SLD 2812 2021 PLC 855 |
Peshawar High Court
Writ Petition No.391-D of 2020 with C.M. Nos.390, 654, 1100 and 1166-D of 2020, decided on 10th December, 2020, Date of hearing: 10th December, 2020.
ABDUL SHAKOOR, JUSTICE, SAHIBZADA ASADULLAH, JUSTICE
Muhammad Idrees Khan and Hashmat ur Rehman for Petitioner. Kamran Hayat Miankhel, Additional Advocate General for
Respondents.
Writ Petition No.391-D of 2020 with C.M. Nos.390, 654, 1100 and 1166-D of 2020, decided on 10th December, 2020, Date of hearing: 10th December, 2020.
ABDUL SHAKOOR, JUSTICE, SAHIBZADA ASADULLAH, JUSTICE
Muhammad Idrees Khan and Hashmat ur Rehman for Petitioner. Kamran Hayat Miankhel, Additional Advocate General for
Respondents.
MALIK MUHAMMAD NAVEED
VS
GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PESHAWAR AND OTHERS
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 2-A,4,25
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Special Police Officers (Regularization of Services) Act (XXVII of 2019)--- ----Ss.2-A, 3 5---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts.2-A, 4 25---Notification vide SO (Budget)HD/15-29/2016 Vol-II dated 08-04-2020--Regularization of constables appointed on contract basis in Special Police Force---Scope---Equal treatment (constable) was reinstated into service from the date of his dismissal, however, vide impugned notification ,his name was omitted and replaced by another person who was at lower number than the petitioner in the list---Department contended that the petitioner was not in service at the time of issuance of impugned notification and thus was not entitled for regularization---Contention of the petitioner was that as he was reinstated into service, so Department had violated his vested rights by not including his name in the list for the regularized employees---Held, that 94 Special Police Officers (SPO) were, admittedly, regularized vide Notification (dated 08-04-2020)---Said Notification was issued in pursuance of the provisions contained in Ss.3 5 of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Special Police Officers ( Regularization of Services) Act, 2019) (the Act 2019) after the recommendation of Provincial Police Officer and the approval of provincial cabinet and concerned department was appointed as constable (Special Police Force) however, he was discharged from service on the basis of allegation leveled against him to be involved in notorious activities filed appeal and during proceedings it was found that the allegation leveled against him did not warrant an extreme action of dismissal from service was finally re-instated into service from date of his dismissal was claiming equal treatment as the other SPOs had been regularized---Plea of the Department was ill-founded and without force as the date when the impugned notification was issued , the petitioner was being proceeded departmentally under disciplinary proceedings and his fate had not been determined yet---Department could not, thus, decide at their ends that the petitioner was not in service---Impugned notification was issued in the intervening period of dismissal and reinstatement of the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492