| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2022 SLG 473 2022 SLD 473 2022 CLC 327 |
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No.42051 of 2021, heard on 29th June, 2021. Date of hearing: 29th June, 2021.
MUHAMMAD SHAN GUL, JUSTICE
Wajid Ali Chishti for Petitioner. Barrister Syed Ali Nouman, Assistant Advocate General for
Respondent.
Writ Petition No.42051 of 2021, heard on 29th June, 2021. Date of hearing: 29th June, 2021.
MUHAMMAD SHAN GUL, JUSTICE
Wajid Ali Chishti for Petitioner. Barrister Syed Ali Nouman, Assistant Advocate General for
Respondent.
AYESHA
VS
ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, SIALKOT AND OTHERS
Law: Specific Relief Act, 1877
Section: 39,42&54
Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----Ss.39, 42 54---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.VI, R.17---Amendment of plaint---Principles---Suit for cancellation of Hiba (gift) Deed, declaration and injunction was filed by respondent/plaintiff regarding suit property/plaintiff filed application to amend her plaint to include her prayer of restoration of possession on the plea that she was illegally dispossessed by petitioner/defendant from suit property---Lower Appellate Court allowed to respondent/plaintiff to amend her plaint---Validity---All rules of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, are geared towards securing proper administration of justice and were always to be interpreted with such aim and purpose--- Discretionary power conferred under O.VI, R.17, C.P.C. on a Court has to be only exercised in consonance with and in the light of judicial principles contained in judicial precedents--- Amendment in pleadings may be allowed where multiplicity of suits can be avoided; amendment does not alter subject matter of suit or cause of action of suit; does not take away any accrued right; plaintiff becomes entitled to further relief by reason of events subsequent to filing of suit; cause of action needs amplification; interest of safe and accurate administration of justice so requires; on account of plaintiffs evidence a new statutory line of defence gets triggered; no injustice is caused; and relief is inadvertently left out---Such list is not exhaustive but just to cataloguing instances where it would be in line with trite and established law to allow amendment in pleadings under O.VI, R.17, C.P.C.---High Court declined to interfere in the order passed by Lower Appellate Court---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances. Syed Muhammad Ali and others v. Syed Dabir Ali and others 2016 SCMR 2164; Haji Sultan Majeed (Decd) through Mehboob Sultan and Habib Sultan and others v. Mst. Shamim Akhtar (Decd) through Mah Jabeen and others 2018 SCMR 82; Karamat Ali and another v. Muhammad Yunus Haji and others PLD 1963 SC 191; Muhammad Mian v. Syed Shamimullah and 2 others 1995 SCMR 69; Muhammad Fayyaz v. Hafiz Liaqat Ali and 5 others 2020 CLC 1184; Syed Nazir Ali Rizvi v.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492