Case Details

Citation(s)
2019 SLG 1812 2019 SLD 1812 2019 PLC 932
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No. 214219 of 2018, hearing Dated: 04-09-2018.
SHAHID, JAMIL KHAN, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Malik Saleem Iqbal Awan
Respondent(s) by: Ch. Sultan Mehmood, Assistant Advocate General Punjab, Bashir Ahmad Goraya, CEO, DEA, Gujranwala and Muhammad Jamil Nasar, A.D. (Lit) Office of CEO, DEA, Gujranwala

QAMAR AZIZ AND OTHERS

VS

GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Law: Higher Education Commission Ordinance, 2002

Section: 10

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 189,199

Higher Education Commission Ordinance (LIII of 2002)--- ----S. 10---Constitutional petition---Maintainability---Policy decision of government---Civil service---Appointment against the posts of ESE (Arts), SESE (Arts) and SSE (Arts)---Candidates having degree of graduation with Sanad of Shahadat-ul-Almia sought appointment against the posts in question on the basis of equivalence certificate---Expression "Individual Institutions"---Scope---Only employer knew the requirements and could determine the suitability of qualification for the post---Determination of an educational qualification or eligibility criteria for appointment against a particular post was a policy decision---Court could not interfere with the policy matter---Government had right to enhance qualification and standards for recruitment---Petitioners could not claim vested right against retrospective application of rules---Higher Education Commission was a regulator for maintenance and improvement of higher education under the Federation---Equivalence certificate issued by Higher Education Commission could not be taken as binding advice to the Government for recruitment against any post---Purpose of equivalence certificate was evaluation, promotion or improvement of higher education and not recommendation for appointment against any post---Expression "Individual Institutions" did exclude the Government, Schools and Colleges being run by the Government---Equivalence certificate granted in favour of petitioners-candidates might be a recommendation for individual educational institution and same could not be held as binding for recruitment by the Government---Petitioners applied for the posts of ESE (Arts), SESE (Arts) and SSE (Arts) which did not fall within the purview of equivalence certificate---Court could not call in question or replace the prescribed educational qualification by competent authority or Government under ordinary circumstances---Policy could only be called in question if it was violative of Fundamental Rights or was in conflict with any provision of law---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances. Sanaullah Khan and others v. District Returning Officer, Mianwali and…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492