Case Details

Citation(s)
2022 SLG 504 2022 SLD 504 2022 YLR 424
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeal No. 271-J of 2010, decided on 14th June, 2021. Date of hearing: 14th June, 2021.
MUHAMMAD AMJAD RAFIQ, JUSTICE
Muhammad Akbar Khan for Appellant with the appellant in person. Ms. Noshi Malik, Deputy Prosecutor General for the State. Rana Nadeem Ahmad for the Complainant.

MST. AZIZ MAI

VS

THE STATE AND OTHErs

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 302(b)

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Delay of seven hours in lodging FIR---Scope---Accused was charged for committing murder of seven years old daughter of her brother/complainant by inflicting iron pipe blow---Record showed that the occurrence took place at 7:30 am but the matter was reported to the police with a delay of seven hours and that too on the arrival of police at their own---Such delay had not been explained---Had the witnesses been present, they must have reported the matter to police, particularly when injured died after 2/3 hours---Said delay on the part of prosecution was fatal, which suggested concoction and deliberation and also raised question about the presence of witnesses at the time of occurrence---Circumstances established that the prosecution had failed to bring home guilt of the accused to the hilt---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Non-recovery of incriminating material---Scope---Accused was charged for committing murder of seven years old daughter of her brother/complainant by inflicting iron pipe blow---Record showed that spot recovery was missing in the case---Cot upon which allegedly the deceased was sitting was not taken into possession nor availability of blood at the crime scene or recovery of blood-stained earth therefrom was shown effected---Investigating Officer had not been produced by the prosecution in support of facts emanating from the registration of FIR routing through post mortem examination till finalization of investigation which was a major lacuna in the case that created gap in complete chain of events--- Circumstances established that the prosecution had failed to bring home guilt of the accused to the hilt---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances. (c) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Delay of nine hours in conducting post-mortem---Scope---Accused was charged for committing murder of seven years old daughter of her…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492