Case Details

Citation(s)
2022 SLG 1443 2022 SLD 1443 2022 PLJ 20
High Court (AJ&K)
W.P. No. 2781 of 2021, decided on 23.12.2021.
SADAQAT HUSSAIN RAJA, C.J.
Mr. Sajid Hussain Abbasi, Advocate for Petitioner. Raja Gul Majeed Khan, Legal Advisor for University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Muzaffarabad for
Respondents.

MUHAMMAD JUNAID KHAN

VS

AZAD JAMMU KASHMIR UNIVERSITY through Vice Chancellor and 6 others

Law: Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974

Section: 24,2(f),24,4(15)

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 63(k)

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution, 1974 (VIII of 1974)-- ----Arts. 24 ,  2(f)--Qualification of a person--A person shall be disqualified to be elected as, and to be, a Member of Assembly if, he is otherwise disqualify from being a Member of Assembly by Constitution or by under any other law.[P. 9] A Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution, 1974 (VIII of 1974)-- ----Art. 24 ,  4(15)--Bar to contest elections--Government servants, including retired government servants are barred from contesting Elections or forming independent group of people who are barred to contest elections for a period of two years, from date of cessation of their employment or retirement, as case may be.[P. 16] C PLD 2007 SC 52 and PLD 2010 SC 265 ref. Constitution of Pakistan, 1973-- ----Art. 63(k)--Imposing of restriction to contest election--In Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, two years restriction has been imposed to contest election for retired civil servants, hence, no mala-fide has been attributed on behalf of respondents-government--Stance taken by petitioner is not maintainable. [P. 16] B Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution, 1974 (VIII of 1974)-- ----Arts. 4(15), 24 ,  31--Azad Jammu and Kashmir Election Act, 2020, S. 5--Amendment in election act--Issuance of ordinance--Imposing of restrictions regarding participation of retired employees in election--Aggrieved person--Locus standi--Question of whether impugned ordinance placed before legislature assembly was valid or not? whether impugned act is against fundamental rights of petitioners or not--Maintainability--Direction to--A valid law cannot be struck down on whims and wishes of any person otherwise, impugned law has been enforced and promulgated by following after due process of law--Rule under impugned Law have also not been challenged by petitioners, claim of petitioners is vague, which is hereby deterred--It is settled principle of law that Legislature is competent to make a law, has ample of legislation--Under law, they are not eligible to participate in General Elections, 2021, claim of petitioners cannot be considered--Counsel for petitioners failed to point out any…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492