Case Details

Citation(s)
2022 SLG 516 2022 SLD 516 2022 YLR 484
Sindh High Court
Special Criminal Anti-Terrorism Appeals Nos. 45 of 2004 and3 of 2005, decided on 15th April, 2020. Date of hearing: 2ndApril, 2020.
MOHAMMAD KARIM KHAN AGHA, JUSTICE, ZULFIQAR ALI SANGI, JUSTICE
S. Mehmood Alam Rizvi and Abdul Rasheed Nizamani for Appellants (in Special Criminal Anti-Terrorism Appeal No. 45 of 2004).Saleem Akhtar Buriro, Additional Prosecutor General for
Respondent (in Special Criminal Anti-Terrorism Appeal No. 45 of 2004).Sa

MUHAMMAD AAMIR AND ANOTHERVSTHE STATE

Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Section: 154

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 302,324,109,34

Law: Anti Terrorism Act, 1997

Section: 7

(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 154---First information report---Scope---First Information Report must be lodged with promptitude in order to give it reliability and credibility unless the delay is explained. Khalid Javed v. State 2003 SCMR 1419 rel. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302, 324, 109 34---Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), S. 7---Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, abetment, common intention, act of terrorism---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Delay of about nine days in lodging the FIR---Effect---Prosecution case was that the accused persons and two unknown culprits started firing at the passengers of the Passenger Van during the course of which the complainant and a passenger sustained bullet injuries, who were shifted to the hospital where injured passenger succumbed to the injuries---Incident had taken place on 23.06.2003 and yet the statement of deceased/complainant under S. 154, Cr.P.C. which formed the basis of the FIR, was recorded on 02.07.2003---Prosecution had tried to justify the delay based on the fact that the complainant was so seriously injured that it was not possible to record his statement before that time---Admittedly, the complainant was seriously injured and he was operated on and kept in the ICU---Medical Officer, who first received the injured at hospital, stated in his cross-examination that the injured was in a position to make a statement---Even Medico Legal Certificate of victim revealed that on admission to the hospital, he was conscious---Statement under S.154, Cr.P.C. of victim could have been recorded without delay---Even otherwise there was no evidence to suggest that the complainant was completely comatose and unable to make a statement before 02.07.03---To wait for the complainant to gain consciousness before recording his statement S. 154, Cr.P.C. was not essential---Prosecution did not adequately explain the delay in registering the FIR after a lapse of nine days especially as there were others available who could have readily and quite capably registered the FIR as they were well aware of the basic facts of the incident---Circumstances established that the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492