Case Details

Citation(s)
2022 SLG 517 2022 SLD 517 2022 YLR 503
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeal No. 194207 of 2018 and Murder Reference No. 109 of 2019, decided on 3rd June, 2021. Date of hearing: 3rd June, 2021.
SADAQAT ALI KHAN, JUSTICE, MUHAMMAD TARIQ NADEEM, JUSTICE
Asghar Ali Gill, Mian Shahzad Hussain and Qasim Ijaz for Appellant. Rai Akhtar Hussain, Deputy Prosecutor General for the State. Malik Muhammad Ayub Sialvi for the Complainant.

EHSAN ULLAH

VS

THE STATE

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 302(b),364,201

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302(b), 364 201---kidnapping or abduction in order to murder, causing disappearance of evidence of offence, or giving false information to screen offender---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Lat seen evidence---Scope---Accused was charged for committing murder of the son of complainant after kidnapping him---Record showed that the prosecution had produced complainant and his brother to prove the last seen evidence---Real brother of complainant had not been able to give any plausible reasoning qua his presence in the house of complainant---Both the said witnesses had not made any effort to inform the police till the recovery of dead body of deceased---Such conduct of said witnesses showed that they had cooked up a false story---Even otherwise, the police had exonerated co-accused in the case---In the corollary of such facts, said witnesses were not trustworthy and confidence inspiring---Circumstances established that the prosecution had failed to prove its case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances. (b) Criminal trial--- ----Last seen evidence---Scope---Last seen evidence was always considered to be a week type of evidence, unless corroborated by some other independent piece of evidence. Altaf Hussain v. Fakhar Hussain and another 2008 SCMR 1103 rel. (c) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302(b), 364 201---kidnapping or abduction in order to murder, causing disappearance of evidence of offence or giving false information to screen offender---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Wajtakkar evidence---Scope---Accused was charged for committing murder of the son of complainant after kidnapping him---Prosecution had attempted to prove the case through wajtahhar evidence from the mouth of a witness who stated that he along with other witness had seen the accused and deceased coming out from the sugarcane crops and they both were disturbed and in perplexed condition---Said witness was neighbourer of complainant and he had made dishonest improvements in his statement---Said witness had failed to point out the name of owner of sugarcane crop from…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492