Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860

Section: 302(b),324,337-F(iii)

Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Section: 265-H(ii)

Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860)-- ----Ss. 302(b), 324 337-F(iii)--Criminal Procedure Code, (V of 1898), S. 265-H(ii)--Conviction and sentence--Challenge to--Qatl-e-amd--Perusal of statements of prosecution witnesses reveal that same are consistent, coherent and confidence inspiring--PWs stuck to their gun and could not be shaken and shattered despite lengthy cross-examination--Counsel for appellants failed to point out a single contradiction, omission or improvement--We for ourselves gave due attention and perused evidence very minutely and carefully but nothing favourable to defence or fatal to prosecution could be noticed--There is no improvement, omission or contradiction--All PWs have supported each other not only on material rather on minute points, despite fact, that statements were recorded) after considerable delay--trial Court dealt with evidence very beautifully by strictly adhering to principles governing law on subject, material available on record were appreciated, assessed, analyzed and evaluated golden scales--formulated pointes were resolved with reasons by referred to relevant material evidence leaving no room for any other conclusions, except one i.e. guilt which is natural, legal, logical and only conclusion in circumstances of this case--We do not subscribe to learned counsel for appellants that there is delay or report could not be lodged, as claimed--It has been established on record beyond shadow of doubt that police reached at venue and removed dead bodies to hospital--Exhibit 15/B shows that injured Majano was referred to hospital by police and M.L.C. issued in favour of Majano reveals that he was produced before Medical Officer by ASI at 2:00 a.m on 26.03.2012--So, for all intent and purposes, law was set on motion--Secondly, so far as allegation of encounter by police is concerned, there is not an iota of evidence to support this concocted, frivolous, fictitious and after thought story as set up by defence--During course of cross-examination, PWs were suggested that both deceased committed murder of each other--So, defence has been taking different stances, true, accused is not bound to take specific plea or defence, but once…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492