Case Details

Citation(s)
2021 SLG 2152 2021 SLD 2152 2021 PLJ 175
Supreme Court of Pakistan
C.Ps. Nos. 1554-L to 1573-L of 2020, decided on 26.11.2020,Date of hearing: 26.11.2020. (On appeals from the judgmentsof Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore dated 18.06.2020, passedin Appeals Nos. 532, 534, 535, 546, 537, 538, 539, 540, 541,542, 543, 544,
MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK, JUSTICE, SAJJAD ALI SHAH, JUSTICE, SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH, JUSTICE.
Raja M. Arif, Additional A.G. for Petitioners (in all cases).

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, FAISALABAD AND OTHErsVSJAVED IQBAL

Law: Punjab Employees Efficiency, Discipline and Accountability Act, 2006

Section: 21

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 212(3)

Punjab Employees Efficiency, Discipline and Accountability Act, (XII of 2006)-- ----S. 21--Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, Art. 212(3) was working as forest guard--Initiation of departmental proceedings--Issuance of show-cause notice--Conducting of inquiry--Retirement from service during pendency of inquiry proceedings--Major penalty was awarded after more than two years of retirement--Aim of interpretation in law--Scheme of act--Imposing of liability on a retired employee--Statutory time frame--Exercising of power by a public official--Question of, whether proviso to Section 21 of PEEDA Act is directory or mandatory--Any long drawn departmental proceedings against a retired employee would be an unnecessary drain on resources of Government and would also distract Government from its prime objective of regulating its employees--Where a public official can impose liability on a retired employee if power is exercised within a certain statutory timeframe and there is a delay in exercise of such power on part of a public official, no such liability can be imposed after lapse of statutory period--Finalization of departmental proceedings not later than two years of retirement of employee under proviso to section 21 of Act is a mandatory provision and any proceedings after said statutory period shall stand abated and any orders passed after efflux of above time period are void and have no legal effect--Departmental proceedings against respondent have been finalized after a period of two years of his retirement, departmental proceedings, therefore, have no legal consequence and subsequent departmental orders are void and have no legal effect--Petitions dismissed. Punjab Employees Efficiency, Discipline and Accountability Act, (XII of 2006)-- ----S. 21--Proceedings against retired employee--In case of retired employee, proceedings so initiated against him shall be finalized not later than two years of his retirement. Employee-- ----A person who is in employment either in a Corporation or in Government service. JUDGMENT Civil Petitions Nos. 1554-L to 1564-L, 1566-L to 1568-L and 1570-L of 2020. Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, JUSTICE.--The substantial question of law of public…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492