| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2018 SLG 1989 2018 SLD 1989 2018 CLC 1399 |
Balochistan High Court
C.P. No. 15 of 2000, decided on 30-03-2018. Date of hearing: 21-03-2018.
MUHAMMAD EJAZ SWATI, JUSTICE ABDULLAH BALOCH, JUSTICE
Jameel Ahmed Babai for Petitioners. Khushnood Ahmed for
Respondents Nos.1 to 10. Adnan Bashara for
Respondents Nos.11 to 23. Mrs. Sabira Islam, Additional A.G. for Official
Respondents.
C.P. No. 15 of 2000, decided on 30-03-2018. Date of hearing: 21-03-2018.
MUHAMMAD EJAZ SWATI, JUSTICE ABDULLAH BALOCH, JUSTICE
Jameel Ahmed Babai for Petitioners. Khushnood Ahmed for
Respondents Nos.1 to 10. Adnan Bashara for
Respondents Nos.11 to 23. Mrs. Sabira Islam, Additional A.G. for Official
Respondents.
MST. POPALZAI AND OTHERS
VS
MUHAMMAD ASIF KHAN AND 33 OTHERS
Law:
Section:
(a) Pakistan Administration of Evacuee Property Act (XII of 1957)--- ----Ss. 20 & 22 (2)---Balochistan (Administration of Evacuee Property) Regulation, 1950, S. 17---Evacuee property---Allotment of---Sale---Confirmation of---Scope---Petitioners purchased suit property already allotted as evacuee land and thereafter sought confirmation of sale effected in their favour---Application for confirmation of sale was dismissed by the Member Board of Revenue---Validity---Allottees were not made party nor the allotment order made in their favour was challenged---Order of Rehabilitation Authority and mutation were in field when question of confirmation of sale was taken up---Such application was to be made within the prescribed period and by party to the transaction or by any person claiming under such party---Custodian of Evacuee Property was required to hold a summary inquiry in the prescribed manner and reject the application if prescribed conditions were not satisfied---Nothing was available on record with regard to any inquiry by the Custodian of Evacuee Property---Transaction in favour of petitioners had been made contrary to law---Father of applicants had died long after the ownership of property had vested in the Government---Application should have been filed within thirty days from the prescribed date---Predecessor of petitioners did not apply for confirmation of sale before competent forum during his life time---Application for confirmation of sale being time barred, Petitioners had no locus standi to file the application---Member Board of Revenue had passed the impugned order after proper appreciation of record---Legal heirs of allottees could seek proper remedy with all just and legal exceptions---Disputed questions of fact raised by the petitioners could not be resolved under constitutional jurisdiction---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances. Abdul Haq and another v. Mst. Surrya Begum and others 2002 SCMR 1330 rel. (b) Constitution of Pakistan--- ---Art. 199---Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Scope---Disputed questions of facts could not be entertained under constitutional jurisdiction of High Court. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492