| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2018 SLG 1992 2018 SLD 1992 2018 CLC 1471 |
Sindh High Court
Constitutional Petition No. S-711 of 2014, decided on, 03-02-2017. Date of hearing: 04-11-2016.
KHADIM HUSSAIN M. SHEIKH, JUSTICE
Abdur Rehman for Petitioner. Sardar Muhammad Yusuf for
Respondent No.1.
Constitutional Petition No. S-711 of 2014, decided on, 03-02-2017. Date of hearing: 04-11-2016.
KHADIM HUSSAIN M. SHEIKH, JUSTICE
Abdur Rehman for Petitioner. Sardar Muhammad Yusuf for
Respondent No.1.
DR. MASUMA HASAN
VS
MUHAMMAD HAFEEZ AND OTHERS
Law:
Section:
(a) Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance ( XVII of 1979)--- ----S.15---Civil Procedural Code (V of 1908), S.12(2)---Application for setting aside eviction order---Allegation of fraud and misrepresentation against landlord---Effect---Tenant contended that the Court could not dismiss her application without framing issues and recording evidence---Landlord contended that matter had already been decided at all relevant available forums---Validity---Tenant after contesting the matter and having exhausted all the remedies available to her, could not re-agitate the same matter by filing the application under S. 12(2), C.P.C. and that too before the first forum, which amounted to review of the s and orders, depriving the decree-holder the fruits of the decree---Remedy provided under S. 12(2), C.P.C. would not be available like a regular suit, and the court could dispose off such application without framing of the issues and recording evidence of the parties---Remedy of filing application under S. 12(2), C.P.C. was not available to the tenant in circumstances---Tenant had filed application under S. 12(2), C.P.C. in order to retain the possession of the rented premises with herself by making absurd assertions---Record did not even remotely suggest that any fraud or misrepresentation was committed with the Court---Rent Controller had dismissed the application under S. 12(2), C.P.C. filed by the tenant, after proper application of mind and appreciating the record and, was justified in not framing the issues on such absurd assertions---No illegality or infirmity having been noticed in the impugned order---Constitutional petition was dismissed accordingly. Mrs. Amina Bibi v. Nasrullah and others 2000 SCMR 296; Mst. Zarina Begum v. Muhammad Ali and others 2012 YLR 2681; Happy Family Associate through Chief Executive v. Messrs Pakistan International Trading Company PLD 2006 SC 226 and Tanveer Siddiqui and another v. Muhammad Rashid 2010 YLR 1851 ref. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----S.12(2)---Application under S.12(2), C.P.C.---Nature and scope---Remedy of filing such application would not be available like a regular suit and court could dispose of such application…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492