Case Details

Citation(s)
2021 SLG 786 2021 SLD 786 2021 YLR 328
Islamabad High Court
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1027-B of 2020, decision Dated: 21st October, 2020.
AAMER FAROOQ, JUSTICE
Arshad Hussain Yousafzai and Ms. Abida Mukhtar for Petitioner. Ch. Adnan Qamar for Complainant. Raja Khalid Mahmood Khan, Deputy Attorney General with Humaira Aslam, SI, FIA for the State.

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ

VS

THE STATE AND ANOTHER

Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Section: 497

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 406,468,471,109

Law: Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act, 2016

Section: 14,16

(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 406, 468, 471 109---Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016), Ss. 14 16---Criminal breach of trust, forgery for purpose of cheating, using as genuine a forged document, abetment---Electronic fraud---Unauthorized use of identity information---Bail, grant of---Scope---Accused was alleged to have advertised a vehicle on an online marketplace which was purchased by complainant, however subsequently, its invoice was found to be fabricated and forged---None of the offences with which the accused was charged fell within prohibitory clause of S.497, Cr.P.C.---Investigating Officer had yet to determine whether the invoice was forged by the accused or the one from whom he had purchased the vehicle---Accused was not required for further investigation and case against him was one of further inquiry---Petition for grant of bail was allowed, in circumstances. Salim Dad Khan v. Ghulam Muhammad and others 2011 YLR 540; Muhammad Ali v. The State 2008 PCr.LJ 1360; Tabbasam Ahmed Qureshi v. The State 2000 PCr.LJ 105 and Syed Maqsood Hussain Shah v. The State 2007 PCr.LJ 171 ref. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497---Bail---Scope---Where the offences do not fall within prohibitory clause of S.497, Cr.P.C., grant of bail in such like cases is a rule and refusal is an exception. Tariq Bashir and 5 others v. The State PLD 1995 SC 34 ref. (c) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497---Bail---Pendency of FIR of similar nature---Effect---Scope---Mere pendency of FIR of similar nature against accused is not a ground for refusal of bail unless any one of them has culminated into conviction. Qurban Ali v. The State and others 2017 SCMR 279 ref. ORDER AAMER FAROOQ, JUSTICE:---.--- The petitioner, Muhammad Nawaz seeks bail after arrest in case FIR No.16 dated 11.06.2020 for offences under sections 14 and 16 PECA, 2016 read with sections 406/468/471 and 109, P.P.C. registered at Police Station FIA Cyber Crime Reporting Centre, Islamabad. 2. Respondent No.2 filed a complaint against the petitioner, which resulted in above mentioned FIR, wherein it was alleged that petitioner…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492