| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2018 SLG 228 2018 SLD 228 2018 PCRLJ 153 |
Peshawar High Court
Cr. Misc. B.A. No. 160-A of 2017, decision & hearing Date : 17-05-2017
SYED MUHAMMAD ATTIQUE SHAH, JUSTICE
Ghulam Mustafa Khan Swati and Saeed Ahmad Shah Mashadi for Petitioners. Shad Muhammad Khan for
Respondents.
Cr. Misc. B.A. No. 160-A of 2017, decision & hearing Date : 17-05-2017
SYED MUHAMMAD ATTIQUE SHAH, JUSTICE
Ghulam Mustafa Khan Swati and Saeed Ahmad Shah Mashadi for Petitioners. Shad Muhammad Khan for
Respondents.
SHER AFZAL AND OTHErs
VS
THE STATE AND OTHERS
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 497
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 302,34
(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302 & 34---Qatl-i-amd, common intention---Bail, grant of---Further inquiry---Prosecution case was that accused-petitioners in furtherance of common intention committed qatl-i-amd of father of complainant---No doubt, the accused-petitioners were directly charged in the FIR by the complainant but at the same time, complainant was not an eye-witness of the occurrence---Report of the occurrence was lodged after the delay of twenty five hours which was based on the information to the complainant by witness---Role of firing was attributed by the said witness to both the accused-petitioners which would be subject to scrutiny at the trial, especially when the postmortem of the deceased had not been conducted---Site plan was not in support of the prosecution case---Nothing incriminating had been recovered from the accused-petitioners---No direct or circumstantial evidence was available on the record connecting the accused-petitioners with the commission of alleged offence---Record showed that there was cross-version of the occurrence lodged by the accused party against the brother of the complainant---Circumstances suggested that case of the accused-petitioners was one of the further inquiry into the guilt as contemplated in S. 497(2), Cr.P.C.---Accused-petitioners were allowed bail in circumstances. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497(2)---Bail---Absconsion of accused---Effect---Mere absconsion of the accused would not be sufficient when otherwise a case for bail in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances was made out. Mitho Pitafi's case 2009 SCMR 299; Ehsanullah's case 2012 SCMR 1137; Ikramul-Haq's case 2012 SCMR 1273 and Qamar alias Mitho's case PLD 2012 SC 222 rel. (c) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497---Bail---Principle---Observations made in bail order were tentative in nature and would not affect the case during the trial in any manner whatsoever. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY: SYED MUHAMMAD ATTIQUE SHAH, JUSTICE:---.--- Accused-petitioners Sher Afzal and Munawar alias Boi, after having been refused bail by the learned lower Court in case…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492