| Citation(s) |
|---|
| SLG 1871 (2019) 121 SLD 1871 (2019) 121 SCMR 1297 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Appeal No. 21-P of 2010, decision & hearing Dated: 29-04-2019. (Against the judgment Dated 18.-6.2008 passed by the Peshawar High Court, Peshawar in Criminal Appeal No. 425/2005 with Murder Reference No. 40 of 2005)
MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK, JUSTICE SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH, JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Astaghfirullah, Advocate Supreme Court
Respondent(s) by: Mujahid Ali Khan, Additional Advocate-General, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
Criminal Appeal No. 21-P of 2010, decision & hearing Dated: 29-04-2019. (Against the judgment Dated 18.-6.2008 passed by the Peshawar High Court, Peshawar in Criminal Appeal No. 425/2005 with Murder Reference No. 40 of 2005)
MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK, JUSTICE SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH, JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Astaghfirullah, Advocate Supreme Court
Respondent(s) by: Mujahid Ali Khan, Additional Advocate-General, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
WAZIR
VS
THE STATE AND ANOTHER
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 365A
Law: Anti Terrorism Act, 1997
Section: 7(e)
(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 365-A--- Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), S. 7(e)---Kidnapping or abduction for extorting property, valuable security etc., act of terrorism---Reappraisal of evidence---Case based on confessional statement of accused---Once prosecution opted to rely upon a confessional statement of an accused to his detriment it must come forward with the disclosure above all suspicions and taints---Occurrence took place in February 2002, whereas the appellant statedly made his confessional statement months later on 27-6-2002---Confessional statement spreading over four hand written pages was strangely elaborate and exhaustive; it was more of an elaborative statement to cater for the needs of the prosecution than a declaration of guilt by a remorseful or repentant offender---Argument that such a detailed narrative could neither be voluntary nor spontaneous was not entirely without substance---Confessional statement of accused could not be favourably received without being imprudent for another reason; it had been disbelieved qua eight co-accused persons---Furthermore findings recorded by the medical officer with regard to cause of death were not in line with the details purportedly furnished by the accused--- Prosecution case against the appellant was not free from doubt and thus it would be un-safe to maintain his conviction---Appeal was allowed and accused was acquitted of the charge. (b) Criminal trial--- ----Confessional statement of accused, reliance upon--- Scope---Confessional statement had to be received holistically without quantification; once it was found unreliable qua majority of the co-accused persons notwithstanding different roles it could not furnish basis for accused's conviction as well. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY: QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, J.--- Wazir son of Shamshair, appellant herein, was tried along side eleven others by the learned Special Judge, Anti-Terrorism Court at Saidu Sharif for being a privy to abduction of Muhammad Naeem deceased in order to exact ransom from his family; he was arrested much late in the day, finally indicted along side Noor Zaman co-accused; consequent upon their convictions they were…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492