| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2021 SLG 2637 2021 SLD 2637 2021 SCMR 1466 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Petition No.540-L of 2021, decided on 14th July, 2021, Date of hearing: 14th July, 2021. (Against the order dated 31.03.2021 passed by the Lahore High Court of Lahore in Crl. Misc. No.19186-B of 2021)
UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JUSTICE, SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH, JUSTICE, QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, JUSTICE
Syed Tayyab Nasir Mehmood, Advocate Supreme Court (video link at Lahore) along with Syed Husnain Haider, in person (at Islamabad) for Petitioner. Ch. Muhammad Maqsood Butter, Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondents.
Criminal Petition No.540-L of 2021, decided on 14th July, 2021, Date of hearing: 14th July, 2021. (Against the order dated 31.03.2021 passed by the Lahore High Court of Lahore in Crl. Misc. No.19186-B of 2021)
UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JUSTICE, SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH, JUSTICE, QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, JUSTICE
Syed Tayyab Nasir Mehmood, Advocate Supreme Court (video link at Lahore) along with Syed Husnain Haider, in person (at Islamabad) for Petitioner. Ch. Muhammad Maqsood Butter, Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondents.
SYED HASNAIN HAIDER
VS
THE STATE AND ANOTHER
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 497
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 489-F
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 489-F---Dishonestly issuing a cheque---Bail, refusal of---Plea of accused that the dishonored cheques were only issued as a security instrument/surety to settle a family dispute---Validity---Bank cheques admittedly belonged to the accused---Accused had not been able to point out, even obliquely, to any clause of contract/agreement or any portion thereof, in performance whereof, the accused purportedly stood surety---Supported by statutory presumption of being a valid instrument, a drawer could not ward off the consequences of its failure through a plea of being an unsuspecting surety---Even otherwise, within the family fold in a close degree, the accused has not been able to point out any mala fide or animosity, possibly lurking behind his arrest in a non-bailable/cognizable offence---Petition for leave to appeal was dismissed, leave was refused and accused was refused bail. ORDER QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, J.--- In a family breach, the petitioner has been blamed by the complainant, no other than a close relative, to have issued him two bank cheques, to the tune of rupees one crore forty-seven lac, towards fulfillment of a financial obligation, arisen out of a botched sale transaction relating to some piece of land, bounced upon presentation; avoiding arrest for a considerable span of time, he has finally been declined judicial protection by a learned Judge-in-Chamber of Lahore High Court vide order dated 31.3.2021 to argue before us that in the absence of any subsisting financial obligation he had handed over the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492