| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2021 SLG 2230 2021 SLD 2230 2021 PLJ 212 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Crl. A. No. 327-L & Crl. Ps. 1204-L of 2020 and 1436-L of 2016, decided on 26.3.2021, Date of hearing: 26.3.2021. (On appeal from the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Lahore dated 04.10.2016 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 610 of 2012 and M.R. No. 170 of
MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK, JUSTICE, SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH, JUSTICE, AMIN-UD-DIN KHAN, JUSTICE
Mian Shah Abbas, ASC for Petitioner-Appellant (in Criminal Appeal No. 327-L and Criminal Petition No. 1204-L of 2020). Syed Tayyab Mehmood Jafri, ASC for Petitioner (in Criminal Petition No. 1436-L of 2016). M. Amjad Rafiq, Additional P.G. Punjab for St
Crl. A. No. 327-L & Crl. Ps. 1204-L of 2020 and 1436-L of 2016, decided on 26.3.2021, Date of hearing: 26.3.2021. (On appeal from the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Lahore dated 04.10.2016 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 610 of 2012 and M.R. No. 170 of
MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK, JUSTICE, SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH, JUSTICE, AMIN-UD-DIN KHAN, JUSTICE
Mian Shah Abbas, ASC for Petitioner-Appellant (in Criminal Appeal No. 327-L and Criminal Petition No. 1204-L of 2020). Syed Tayyab Mehmood Jafri, ASC for Petitioner (in Criminal Petition No. 1436-L of 2016). M. Amjad Rafiq, Additional P.G. Punjab for St
LIAQAT ALI AND another--AppellantS
VS
STATE AND OTHErs
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 302
Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860)-- ----S. 302--Qatl-i-Amd--According to the doctor, injured was brought to the hospital after two hours of the occurrence, besides the record is totally silent about his admission and his death in hospital--Complainant is not inmate of the house, even he did not mention the purpose of his visit--Motive set out has not been believed by the learned courts below--Recovery of weapon is no avail, because report of FSL is only to its in working condition--Presence of eye witnesses at the place of occurrence at the relevant time is not free from doubts--Appeal is allowed. JUDGMENT Manzoor Ahmad Malik, J.- Prosecution case against the convict-appellant Liaqat Ali as divulged from the contents of FIR, which was registered on written application (Ex.PB/1) of complainant Muhammad Kabeer, is that on 16.09.2006 at about 06.00 p.m., he was sitting in the house of his nephew Muhammad Nawaz, when appellant along with Mumtaz Ali and Manzoor Ahmad armed with their respective weapons entered the premises while raising lalkaras. Appellant Liaqat Ali with his rifle .222 bore fired at Muhammad Nawaz, which landed at his flank after passing through his right arm. Muhammad Nawaz in injured condition was taken to hospital at Changa Manga by complainant and others, wherefrom he was referred to Jinnah Hospital, Lahore. Muhammad Nawaz later on succumbed to injuries. 2. The appellant and his co-accused were accordingly charged for the murder of Muhammad Nawaz by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chunian, District Kasur. A regular trial was conducted and on its conclusion, the learned trial Court, vide its judgment dated 20.03.2012, convicted the appellant and his co-accused Mumtaz Ahmad under Section 302(b)/34, P.P.C. Appellant Liaqat Ali was sentenced to death whereas Mumtaz Ahmad was sentenced to imprisonment for life. Both of them were also directed to pay compensation of Rs. 100,000/- each to the legal heirs of deceased, in default whereof to undergo SI for six months each. Appellant Liaqat Ali and Mumtaz Ahmad were further convicted under Section 459, P.P.C. and sentenced to 10 years RI each, with fine of Rs. 20,000/-each, in default whereof to…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492