| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2021 SLG 2239 2021 SLD 2239 2021 PLJ 258 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
J.P. No. 147 of 2016, decided on 7.12.2020, Date of hearing:7.12.2020. (Against the judgment of the Lahore High Court,Rawalpindi Bench, Rawalpindi dated 12.02.2016 passed in Crl.Appeal No. 16-J of 2011, Crl. Revision No. 31 of 2011 andM.R. No. 25 of 2
MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK, JUSTICE, MAZHAR ALAM KHAN MIANKHEL, JUSTICE, SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH, JUSTICE
Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, AOR for Petitioners.Nemo for Complainant.Mirza Abid Majeed, DPG, Punjab for State.
J.P. No. 147 of 2016, decided on 7.12.2020, Date of hearing:7.12.2020. (Against the judgment of the Lahore High Court,Rawalpindi Bench, Rawalpindi dated 12.02.2016 passed in Crl.Appeal No. 16-J of 2011, Crl. Revision No. 31 of 2011 andM.R. No. 25 of 2
MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK, JUSTICE, MAZHAR ALAM KHAN MIANKHEL, JUSTICE, SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH, JUSTICE
Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, AOR for Petitioners.Nemo for Complainant.Mirza Abid Majeed, DPG, Punjab for State.
NAVEED ASGHAR AND 2 OTHERSVSSTATE
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 302(b)/392/34
Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860) ----Ss. 302(b)/392/34--Identification parade--Chance witness--Recovery--Expert report--Benefit of doubt--Heinous nature of crime should not blur eyes of justice--Cases are to be decided on basis of evidence and evidence alone and not on basis of sentiments and emotions--Testimony of chance witness requires cautious scrutiny and is not accepted unless he gives satisfactory explanation of his presence at or near place of occurrence at relevant time--In absence of reports of Chemical Examiner and Serologist on these facts, assertion of investigating officer as to use of said motorcycle in commission of crime carries no legal worth--Three daughters would have been best persons to identify gold ornaments-- names and particulars of those persons who had brought mobile phones were not mentioned in case dairy-- recovery proceedings were not seen by any person from public other than said witnesses to recovery--It is quite astonishing that both recovery witnesses were close relatives of complainant reached police station at time when investigating officer planned to make a raid for arrest of accused persons and also when accused persons were ready to cooperate for making recoveries during investigation--Court disbelieved alleged recovery of blood-stained weapon of offence, i.e. a chaff cutter (Toka), made after about one month of occurrence--When substantive evidence fails to connect accused person with commission of offence or is disbelieved, corroborative evidence is of no help--Recovery of a blood-stained knife, alleged weapon of offence, insufficient for conviction on excluding testimony of alleged eyewitness from consideration and finding occurrence as an unseen one--It was necessary for investigating officer to get conducted test identification proceedings as to identification of petitioners--It was a serious failure in performance of his duty to conduct investigation of case diligently and efficiently--Mere conjectures and probabilities cannot take place of proof--If a case is decided merely on high probabilities regarding existence or non-existence of a fact to prove guilt of a person, golden rule of giving “benefit of…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492