Case Details

Citation(s)
2020 SLG 1960 2020 SLD 1960 2020 YLR 1509
Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench, Bahalwalpur
Cr. Appeal No. 323 of 2016/BWP, heard on 14-01-2020
SARDAR MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ DOGAR, JUSTICE TARIQ SALEEM SHEIKH, JUSTICE
Muhammad Ashfaq Gujjar for Appellants. Asghar Ali Gill, Deputy Prosecutor General for the State. Syed Zeeshan Haider, assisted by Zafar Iqbal Sheikh for the Complainant.

NAZEER AHMAD AND 3 OTHERS

VS

THE STATE AND ANOTHERS

Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860

Section: 148,149,302,337A(i),337-F(i),337-F(v),33 7-L(2),452

Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Section: 161,410

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 452, 337-A(i), 337-F(i), 337-F(v), 337-L(2), 148 & 149---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 161---House-trespass after preparation for hurt, assault or wrongful restraint, shajjah-i-khafifah, shajjah-i-mudihah, ghayr-jaifah, hashimah, rioting, armed with deadly weapon, common object---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt--- Dishonest improvements---Delayed statement--- Recovery of commonplace articles---Acquittal of co-accused having similar role---Scope---Prosecution case was that the complainant party was present in their house when the accused party trespassed into their house and attacked them---Complainant had deviated from her cross-version and had introduced new facts in her examination-in-chief---One of the eye-witnesses had stated that she had joined investigation after two/three months of the incident---Statement of another eye-witness under S.161, Cr.P.C. was recorded after four/five days of the incident---Sotas allegedly recovered from the accused were commonplace articles and were not blood-stained--- Complainant had nominated nine persons in the cross-version but the trial court had acquitted five of them on the same evidence on which it had convicted the accused persons---Trial court could not have done so as there was no independent corroboration---Prosecution had failed to prove the charge against the accused beyond doubt---Appeal was allowed. Irfan Ali v. The State 2015 SCMR 840; Shahbaz v. The State 2016 SCMR 1763 and Muhammad Asif v. The State 2017 SCMR 486 ref. Ghulam Sikandar v. Mamaraz Khan PLD 1985 SC 11; Munawar Ali v. The State PLD 1993 SC 251 and Akhtar Ali and others v. The State 2008 SCMR 6 rel. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 161---Examination of witnesses by police---Delayed statement---Scope---Delay in recording statement under S.161, Cr.P.C. impinges on the credibility of the witness. Syed Saeed Muhammad Shah and another v. The State 1993 SCMR 550; Abdul Khaliq v. The State 1996 SCMR 1553 and Muhammad Khan v. Maula Bakhsh and another 1998 SCMR 570 ref. (c) Criminal trial--- ----Witness---Injured witness---Scope---Injuries on a prosecution witness only…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492