| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2018 SLG 748 2018 SLD 748 2018 MLD 684 |
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeal No. 391 of 2013, hearing Date : 08-09-2016.
SHEHRAM SARWAR, CHIEF, JUSTICE
Malik Amir Manzoor Awan for Appellants. Sarfraz Khan Khichi, D.D.P.P. for the State. Sheikh Abdul Samad for the Complainant.
Criminal Appeal No. 391 of 2013, hearing Date : 08-09-2016.
SHEHRAM SARWAR, CHIEF, JUSTICE
Malik Amir Manzoor Awan for Appellants. Sarfraz Khan Khichi, D.D.P.P. for the State. Sheikh Abdul Samad for the Complainant.
MUHAMMAD ASIF AND ANOTHER
VS
THE STATE AND ANOTHER
Law:
Section:
(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302(b), 366-A, 376(2), 379 & 34---Qatl-i-amd, procuration of minor girl, committed rape by two persons in furtherance of common intention, theft, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Circumstantial evidence---Prosecution case was that accused and co-accused after enticing away daughter of complainant, committed rape with her and murdered---Evidence of Wajtakkar produced by the prosecution witness stated that he and witness, since given up, had seen accused persons while going on a motorcycle towards a Nala along with a sack of jute and at that time they were in perplexed condition---Witnesses suspected that there was a dead body of daughter of complainant in the said sack and the same was thrown in the Nala by the accused persons---Said witnesses informed the complainant about seeing of the accused persons after two days---No plausible explanation on the record as to why the witness remained quite for two days and did not inform the complainant---Said witness was close relative of the complainant and his silence about the incident for a long time cast doubt about the veracity of the prosecution case---Circumstances established that the prosecution case was doubtful in nature, benefit of which would resolve in favour of accused not as a matter of grace but as of right. Altaf Hussain v. Fakhar Hussain and another 2008 SCMR 1103; Muhammad Hussain v. The State 2011 SCMR 1127; Ibrahim and others v. The State 2009 SCMR 407 and Sh. Muhammad Amjad v. The State PLD 2003 SC 704 rel. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302(b), 366-A, 376(2), 379 & 34---Qatl-i-amd, procuration of minor girl, committed rape by two persons in furtherance of common intention, theft, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Extra-judicial confession---Scope---Prosecution case was that accused and co-accused after enticing away daughter of complainant, committed rape with her and murdered---Allegedly, accused persons had made extra judicial confession before the prosecution witnesses including father of deceased---Said extra judicial confession was not reliable as the same was a joint…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492