| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2020 SLG 405 2020 SLD 405 2020 PTD 281 2020 PTCL 428 (2020) 121 TAX 412 |
Sindh High Court
Suit No. 676 and C.M.A. No. 5511 of 2019, decision Dated:02-08-2019 Dates of hearing: 30th April, 16th, 22nd and 27thMay, 2019
MUHAMMAD, JUNAID GHAFFAR, JUSTICE
Kashif Nazeer for Plaintiff.Osman A. Hadi, Assistant Attorney General for Defendant No.1.Dr. Shahnawaz for Defendants Nos. 2 and 3.
Suit No. 676 and C.M.A. No. 5511 of 2019, decision Dated:02-08-2019 Dates of hearing: 30th April, 16th, 22nd and 27thMay, 2019
MUHAMMAD, JUNAID GHAFFAR, JUSTICE
Kashif Nazeer for Plaintiff.Osman A. Hadi, Assistant Attorney General for Defendant No.1.Dr. Shahnawaz for Defendants Nos. 2 and 3.
MUHAMMAD FAZAL E RABBI THROUGH AUTHORISED ATTORNEY VSFEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION/CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, REVENUE AND ECONOMIC AFFAIRS, ISLAMABAD AND 3 OTHERS
Law: Customs Act, 1969
Section: 3CC,3D,3E,4,15,219
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 420,478,486
Law: Customs Rules, 2001
Section: R.680,682
Customs Act (IV of 1969)--Ss. 3D, 4, 15 & 219 - Customs Rules, 2001, Rr. 680 & 682 - Intellectual Property Rights ("IPR") - of IPR violating goods - Directorate General of IPR Enforcement - Powers of seizure of goods - Enforcement actions for IPR, initiation of - Application by right-holder for enforcement action - Mandatory nature of requirements prescribed by R. 680 of the Customs Rules, 2001 - Scope- Rules 680 & 682 of Customs Rules, 2001 provided for two distinct situations for enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights ("IPR") and per R. 680 of the Customs Rules, 2001; a right-holder could approach as an applicant, the Directorate General of IPR Enforcement alleging infringement of intellectual property in import of goods, and such application had to be made after fulfilling various requirements including a Bank guarantee, etc. - Rule 682 of Customs Rules, 2001 however, empowered concerned Collectorate to approach the Directorate General of IPR Enforcement for taking cognizance of alleged infringement -r Department could not first illegally detain goods and then complete the formalities and fulfilling the procedure set out in Rr. 680 & 682 of the Customs Rules, 2001 Mandatory procedure provided for in said Rules for must be followed and if not, then an entire enforcement action was be deemed without lawful authority - Legislature in order to protect rights of importer had provided Certain requirements which had to be fulfilled first before an action was taken, and Directorate General of IPR Enforcement was mandated to act in a certain manner -- Directorate General of IPR Enforcement did not have any independent jurisdiction of its own under R. 680 of the Customs Rules, 2001 to initiate any enforcement proceedings and could only act and proceed if an applicant / complainant had approached it with proper and complete application fulfilling requirements as prescribed under R. 680 of Customs Rules, 2001. Khyber Tractors (Pvt) Ltd. through Manager v. Pakistan through Ministry of Finance, Revenue and Economic Affairs, Islamabad PLD 2005 SG 842; Government of the Punjab, Food Department through Secretary Food and another; v. Messrs United Sugar Mills Ltd. and…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492