| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2019 SLG 1533 2019 SLD 1533 2019 MLD 1139 |
Sindh High Court
Criminal Revision Applications Nos. 06 and 13 of 2017, decision Dated: 03-09-2018. Hearing Dated: 16-08-2018.
MUHAMMAD IQBAL KALHORO, JUSTICE SHAMSUDDIN ABBASI, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Salman Talibuddin Additional Attorney General for Pakistan and Miss Maria Ahmed (in Criminal Revision Application No.6 of 2017).
Respondent(s) by: Zeeshan Abdullah Nos.16 and 17 (in Criminal Revision Application No.6 of 2017).
Criminal Revision Applications Nos. 06 and 13 of 2017, decision Dated: 03-09-2018. Hearing Dated: 16-08-2018.
MUHAMMAD IQBAL KALHORO, JUSTICE SHAMSUDDIN ABBASI, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Salman Talibuddin Additional Attorney General for Pakistan and Miss Maria Ahmed (in Criminal Revision Application No.6 of 2017).
Respondent(s) by: Zeeshan Abdullah Nos.16 and 17 (in Criminal Revision Application No.6 of 2017).
PAKISTAN AND OTHERS
VS
PRESIDING OFFICER, SPECIAL JUDGE (OFFENCES IN BANKS), KARACHI AND OTHERS
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 87,88,173,512
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 34,109,409,420,468,400
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 173---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 409, 420, 468 & 471---Supplementary challan, filing of---Criminal breach of trust, cheating and forgery---Case was pending before Trial Court where prosecution intended to file supplementary investigation report (Challan) against accused persons who had been declared proclaimed offender---Trial Court declined to accept supplementary investigation report---Validity---Case pertained to "White Collar crime" allegedly committed by accused, who had been declared as proclaimed offender---Nominated accused shown in supplementary investigation report were beneficiary of misappropriated amount and they were also liable to be prosecuted---Trial Court had out-rightly rejected supplementary investigation report without giving due weight to documents and evidence collected during investigation by Investigating Officer---Such approach of Trial Court was not tenable under law because law stipulated decision of controversies on merits rather than on technicalities---Reinvestigation of a case even after submission of final challan was not barred under law but Trial Court completely ignored such aspect of the matter---High Court set aside order passed by Trial Court as it was unjust and improper and could not be sustained in eyes of law---High Court directed the Trial Court to accept supplementary investigation report (Challan) and proceed with matter in accordance with law---Revision was allowed accordingly. Raja Khurshid Ahmed v. Muhammad Bilal and others 2014 SCMR 474 and Bahadur Khan v. Muhammad Azam and 2 others 2006 SCMR 373 rel. Muhammad Hanif Pathan v. The State and 3 others PLD 1999 Kar. 121; Mustafa and others v. The State 2009 YLR 1375; Muhammad Akbar v. The State and another 1972 SCMR 335; Mitho alias Muhammad Mithai v. Province of Sindh through Secretary Home Department and 15 others 2018 PCr.LJ 101; Asif Ali v. Province of Sindh and 10 others 2016 PCr.LJ 1484; Rao Muhammad Shakir v. Province of Sindh and 6 others PLD 2015 Sindh 213 and Munir Ahmad v. Additional Inspector General of Police, Punjab and 6 others 2016 MLD 2039 ref. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY: SHAMSUDDIN ABBASI, J.---…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492