| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2019 SLG 933 2019 SLD 933 2019 MLD 724 |
High Court (AJ&K)
Family Appeals Nos. 56 and 57 of 2018, decision Dated: 27-11-2018.
RAJA SAJJAD AHMAD KHAN, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Sardar Mohammad Suleman Khan
Respondent(s) by: Sardar Mohammad Anwar Khan
Family Appeals Nos. 56 and 57 of 2018, decision Dated: 27-11-2018.
RAJA SAJJAD AHMAD KHAN, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Sardar Mohammad Suleman Khan
Respondent(s) by: Sardar Mohammad Anwar Khan
AAMARA AZAM
VS
MOHAMMAD NAWAZ KHAN
Law: Azad Jammu and Kashmir Family Courts Act, 1993
Section: 5
Azad Jammu and Kashmir Family Courts Act, 1993 (XI of 1994)--- ----S. 5---Suits for restitution of conjugal rights and jactitation of marriage by husband and wife respectively---Non-production of witnesses mentioned in Column No. 8 of nikahnama---Effect---Wife had denied solemnization of nikah and filed suit for jactitation of marriage---Trial Court decreed the suit for restitution of conjugal rights and dismissed the suit for jactitation of marriage---Validity---Wakil of bride shown in Column No. 6 of nikahnama was not present at the time of execution of Nikahnama as per statements of witnesses---Father of bride, shown as wakil in Nikahnama, got registered an FIR when he got knowledge of forged Nikah---Witnesses of Nikah mentioned in Column No. 8 had not been produced by husband and were not even cited as witnesses---Husband had stated that he did not know the said witnesses while Nikah Khawan did not mention their presence at the time of nikah---Husband's witnesses negated the presence of witnesses of meeting at the time of Nikah---Names of witnesses of nikah, mentioned in Column No. 8, had been written without their presence and their signatures were forged---Time of nikah was shown as 2:00 p.m. whereas witnesses of wife stated that at 2:00 p.m. she was at her home---Prompt dower was shown as ornaments of Rs. 50,000 whereas none of the witnesses stated that it was paid in their presence---Nikah allegedly was solemnized on 12-1-2015, but it was kept secret till November, 2015---Nikah must be proclaimed and proclaimed openly so that it was known to people that spouses were validly married---Nikhanama remained unproved, therefore, it could not be read into evidence and neither a decree of restitution of conjugal rights could be granted on the basis of such Nikahnama---High Court accepted the appeal and passed the decree of jactitation of marriage and dismissed the suit for restitution of conjugal rights, in circumstances. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: RAJA SAJJAD AHMAD KHAN, J.--- Since both the appeals arise out from the common judgment of learned Judge Family Court, Hajira dated 22.3.2018, therefore, these are being consolidated and will be disposed of through this…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492