Case Details

Citation(s)
2021 SLG 2762 2021 SLD 2762 2021 MLD 2011
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeal No.1054 of 2011, heard on 31st May, 2021, Date of hearing: 31st May, 2021.
ALI ZIA BAJWA, JUSTICE
Farooq Raja for Appellant. Ch. Arshad Iqbal Bhullar for
Respondents.

MUHAMMAD TARIQ

VS

FAZAL ABBAS AND 7 OTHERS

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 452,337-A(i),148,149,417

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss.452, 337-A(i), 148 149---House-trespass after preparation for hurt, shajjah-i-mudihah, rioting armed with deadly weapon, unlawful assembly---Appreciation of evidence---Appeal against acquittal---Prosecution case was that the accused persons trespassed the house of sister of complainant and caused injury to complainant---Application under S. 249-A, Cr.P.C., was filed, which was accepted without issuing notice to the complainant, while relying upon the statements of the complainant at bail and remand stage---Scope---If statements of complainant were not made by complainant before the court where prosecution was pending, Trial Court was not justified to give any credence to the statements of complainant given at bail and remand stage, for offence under S.337-A(i), P.P.C., enlisted under S. 345(2), Cr.P.C., and that too, without issuing any notice to the complainant during trial because Trial Court had no occasion and chance to evaluate the credibility, validity, genuineness or being volunteer of alleged compromise entered into between the parties at bail and remand stage---Fact of offence under S.452, P.P.C., being non-compoundable had also escaped the notice of Trial Court---Compromise could only be effected qua the offences which were made compoundable by Sched. II of Cr.P.C.---Offence under S.452, P.P.C., was not made compoundable, even a valid compromise effected between the parties to extent of allied compoundable offence, could not be made basis to acquit the accused from such non-compoundable offence---Although such compromise could be considered for the purpose of quantum of sentence---Order of Trial Court acquitting the respondents on the basis of statements made at bail and remand stage, considering it a valid compromise, was not legally justified, however, it was unequivocally required by S.345, Cr.P.C., that such a compromise could only be effected with the permission of court, before which any prosecution for such offence was pending---During bail and remand stage, prosecution of the case was not pending before the Judicial Magistrate when such statements were recorded, hence such statements could not assume…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492