| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2019 SLG 1554 2019 SLD 1554 2019 CLC 1081 |
Sindh High Court
C.M.As. No. 250, 3405 of 2016 in Suit No. 44 of 2016 andC.M.As. Nos. 5688 of 2016 and 16712, 16713 of 2017 in SuitNo. 841 of 2016, decision Dated: 04-05-2018. Hearing Dated:28-03-2018.
MUHAMMAD, JUNAID GHAFFAR, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Mubeen Lakho (in Suit No.44 of 2016).
Respondent(s) by: Mehmood Sultan Khan Yousafi Nos.1 and 2 (in Suit No.44 of 2016).
C.M.As. No. 250, 3405 of 2016 in Suit No. 44 of 2016 andC.M.As. Nos. 5688 of 2016 and 16712, 16713 of 2017 in SuitNo. 841 of 2016, decision Dated: 04-05-2018. Hearing Dated:28-03-2018.
MUHAMMAD, JUNAID GHAFFAR, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Mubeen Lakho (in Suit No.44 of 2016).
Respondent(s) by: Mehmood Sultan Khan Yousafi Nos.1 and 2 (in Suit No.44 of 2016).
MRS. ROZINA ALI THROUGH ATTORNEY AND OTHERSVSKARACHI METROPOLITAN CORPORATION THROUGH ADMINISTRATOR AND 4 OTHERS
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: 91,O.XXXIX,R.1,2
Law: Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)
Section: 117,120
Law: Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations, 2002
Section: 18
(a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O.XXXIX, Rr.1 & 2---Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations, 2002, Rgln. 18---Suit for declaration and injunction---Interim injunction, grant of---Nuisance---Plaintiff was aggrieved of running a private school by defendant in a residential property situated in the neighborhood of plaintiff---Plea raised by defendant was that usage of premises for educational purposes was not a commercial activity and it was permitted under Bye-laws of the Cantonment Board---Validity---College was being run on commercial basis which was stated in tenancy agreement---Business was not being run for imparting education and it was a commercial activity per se---Element of rendering service though was involved but rendering of education in such manner was purely commercial and business oriented---Defendant had not claimed the organization to be charitable or for that matter any subsidized or free education was being imparted for residents of the area and other students---Usage of premises was for commercial activity and was purely a commercial venture which was being run to make profits---Suit property was not converted either under Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations, 2002 or under Cantonment Bye-laws, for commercial purposes and it remained a residential house---Neither formalities and procedures as provided under Karachi Building and Town Planning Regulations, 2002, were observed nor any such procedure under Cantonment Bye-laws had been adhered to---Plaintiff had made out a prima facie case, whereas balance of convenience was also in its favour and so also causing irreparable loss---Interim injunction was granted in circumstances. Mst. Yawar Azhar Waheed through L.Rs. v. Khalid Hussain and others 2018 SCMR 76; Dr. Shahzad Alam and 2 others v. Beacon Light Academy and 5 others 2011 CLC 1866; Islamuddin and others v. Ghulam Muhammad and others PLD 2004 SC 633; Muhammad Ilyas Hussain v. Cantonment Board, Rawalpindi PLD 1976 SC 785; Messrs Shaheen Service Station v. City District Government, Karachi and others 2005 YLR 1895; Hussain Bux Memon v. Karachi Building Control Authority 2015 YLR 2448; Muhammad Ali Barry v.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492