| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2019 SLG 1564 2019 SLD 1564 2019 PCRLJ 920 |
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeal No. 797-ATA of 2016, decision & hearing Dated: 18-12-2018.
MUJAHID MUSTAQEEM AHMED, JUSTICE SADIQ MAHMUD KHURRAM, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Muhammad Maalik Khan Langha
Respondent(s) by: Ashfaq Ahmad Malik, Deputy District Public Prosecutor with Mian Yaqub, ASI, CTD
Criminal Appeal No. 797-ATA of 2016, decision & hearing Dated: 18-12-2018.
MUJAHID MUSTAQEEM AHMED, JUSTICE SADIQ MAHMUD KHURRAM, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Muhammad Maalik Khan Langha
Respondent(s) by: Ashfaq Ahmad Malik, Deputy District Public Prosecutor with Mian Yaqub, ASI, CTD
ASIM NAWAZ ALIAS KALEEM NAWAZ
VS
THE STATE AND ANOTHER
Law: Anti Terrorism Act, 1997
Section: 9,11-W(2)
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 173,340(2),382B
(a) Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997)--- ----Ss. 9 & 11-W(2)---Sectarian hate speech and propagating banned organizations---Appreciation of evidence---Sentences, reduction in---Special circumstances---Effect---Accused was convicted by Trial Court on sectarian hate speech, propagating banned organizations and was variously sentenced to imprisonment and fine---Validity---Detail of audio files, graphic files and multimedia files was provided in accompanying DVD-I, DVD-II and DVD-III by Punjab Forensic Science Laboratory---Investigating officer also received Verisys verification regarding ownership of SIM Card recovered from mobile phone, which was in name of accused---Prosecution witnesses gave each and every detail of prosecution case and were cross-examined at length---Nothing fruitful cropped up during cross-examination---Tenor of cross-examination also revealed that facts in issue were not challenged seriously---Trial Court rightly appreciated evidence and had rightly found accused guilty of charge levelled against him---Prosecution had successfully proved its case beyond shadow of doubt by producing relevant and admissible evidence---High Court maintained conviction of accused but taking into account mitigating circumstances reduced sentence of imprisonment to that of already undergone but quantum of fine was maintained---Appeal was dismissed accordingly. (b) Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997)--- ----Ss. 9 & 11-W(2)---Sentence---Words 'may extend to' in Ss. 9 & 11, Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997---Connotation---By using words 'may extend to' in such provisions of law provides unspecific sentences and is indicative that courts have to appreciate circumstances indicative of reformation of a convict before deciding about quantum of sentence. (c) Criminal trial--- ----Sentence, quantum of---Philosophies of sentencing accused enumerated. There are the five philosophies of sentencing .The first one is retribution and the purpose is to emphasize taking revenge on a criminal, perpetrator or offenders. The next philosophy is incapacitation which means a way to reduce the chances of an offender committing another crime. Then is the deterrence in which a criminal…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492