| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2019 SLG 1569 2019 SLD 1569 2019 PCRLJ 962 |
Sindh High Court
Suit No. 1808 of 2016, decision Dated: 17-07-2018. Dates ofhearing: 9th, 16th, 23rd, 30th April and 7th May, 2018.
ADNAN IQBAL CHAUDHRY, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Khawaja Shams-ul-Islam and Imran Taj
Respondent(s) by: Asif Rasheed No.1.Nemo No.2.
Suit No. 1808 of 2016, decision Dated: 17-07-2018. Dates ofhearing: 9th, 16th, 23rd, 30th April and 7th May, 2018.
ADNAN IQBAL CHAUDHRY, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Khawaja Shams-ul-Islam and Imran Taj
Respondent(s) by: Asif Rasheed No.1.Nemo No.2.
MST. BILQIS BANO AND ANOTHERVSPAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY THROUGH ADMINISTRATOR AND 4 OTHERS
Law: National Accountability Ordinance, 1999
Section: 12,13,13(a),16A,23,23(b),36
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: S.9,O.VII,R.11
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 8,9,10,10A,14,18,23,24
Law: Specific Relief Act, 1877
Section: 42,54,56(e)
(a) National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999)--- ----S. 13(a)---Order freezing the property---Objection---Locus Standi---Even ostensible owner can file claims/objections before Accountability Court under S. 13(a) of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 though such ostensible owner was not impleaded in reference. National Accountability Bureau v. Zahida Sattar PLD 2001 Kar. 256 and Zahida Sattar v. Federation of Pakistan PLD 2002 SC 408 rel. (b) National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999)--- ----Ss. 12, 13 & 23(b), Proviso--Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 42, 54 & 56(e)---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. VII, R. 11 & S. 9---Suit for declaration and injunction---Rejection of plaint---Jurisdiction barred by law---Scope---Defendant sought rejection of plaint on grounds that in view of specific provisions of Ss. 13 & 23 of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 suit was not maintainable---Validity---Proviso to S. 23 National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 in a sense provided both remedy and forum of Accountability Court not only to accused but also to other persons mentioned in S. 23 of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 against restrictions imposed---National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 was special law, remedy and forum so provided therein was exclusive and had ousted jurisdiction of any other court---Claim that plaintiffs held suit properties in their own right and not as Benamidars of accused persons and were free/permitted to deal with same could only be made to and entertained by Accountability Court under proviso to S. 23 National Accountability Ordinance, 1999---Jurisdiction to decide question raised in suit vested exclusively in Accountability Court under proviso to S. 23 of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 and jurisdiction of civil court under S. 9, C.P.C. was barred---Plaintiff in suit sought to prevent exercise of jurisdiction by Accountability Court under S. 12 of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 but same was prohibited under S. 56(e) of Specific Relief Act, 1877---Plaint was rejected in circumstances. Raja Muhammad Zarat Khan v. Federation of Pakistan PLD 2007 Kar. 597 and Khan Asfandyar Wali v.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492